Testimony on the Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Request

Washington D.C.

Chairwoman Capito, Ranking Member Coons, and Members of the Committee:

Thank you for inviting me to testify today, my first appearance before this subcommittee, in support of the President’s fiscal year 2018 budget request for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).  Before I begin, I would like to congratulate you, Madam Chairwoman, on your new role as head of this subcommittee.  I would also like to express my appreciation to the members of this subcommittee for your support of the SEC’s important mission in previous budget cycles.  Your support has been crucial to the agency’s success, and I look forward to working with each of you on the agency’s FY 2018 request. 

I appreciate the opportunity to discuss with you how the SEC plans to use the $1.602 billion requested for FY 2018. [1]  This level, which is essentially the same as our FY 2017 appropriation, will provide the funding necessary for the SEC to continue meeting our important tripartite mission – protect investors, maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitate capital formation.  The requested FY18 budget will provide the agency with the resources necessary to maintain our oversight of the world’s safest, deepest, and most liquid capital markets while continuing our efforts to further promote economic growth and protect American investors. 

Prior to my confirmation by the U.S. Senate last month, I spent more than two decades in private practice as a securities lawyer.  During this time, I had the privilege and opportunity to engage with members of the SEC’s exceptional staff on matters ranging from landmark capital-raising IPOs to important matters during the 2008 financial crisis and its aftermath.  Now that I have joined the SEC, my experience during my first six weeks has strongly reinforced my view that our talented and committed staff is fundamental to the agency’s effectiveness.  The staff clearly shares the common belief that we serve the American people best when we promote an environment conducive to capital formation while striving to ensure that our markets and our investors remain well protected. 

The investing public, and Americans more generally, will receive significant value in return for the SEC’s $1.602 billion budget.  With a workforce of about 4,600 staff, the SEC oversees (1) approximately $75 trillion in securities trading annually on U.S. equity markets; (2) the disclosures of 8,800 public companies including 77 of the world’s 100 largest companies; and (3) the activities of over 26,000 registered market participants including investment advisers, mutual funds, exchange traded funds, broker-dealers, and transfer agents.  We also engage and interact with the investing public on a daily basis, from our investor education programs and alerts to our SEC.gov portal where, on a typical day, investors and other market participants view or download more than 50 million disclosure documents filed on EDGAR.

Additionally, as this subcommittee is aware, the SEC’s funding is deficit-neutral.  Whatever amount Congress appropriates to the agency will, by law, be fully offset by transaction fees, and will not impact the deficit or the funding available for other agencies.  The current transaction fee rate is just over two cents for every $1,000 in covered securities sales. 

The SEC also has been a net contributor to the U.S. Treasury in other ways that are not directly related to our appropriations.  By law, companies pay a fee to the SEC at the time they register securities for sale.  For FY 2018, the fee rate will be set at a level sufficient to collect $620 million.  A small portion of these collections – $50 million – will be put into the Reserve Fund, which the agency devotes to information technology improvements, while the remaining $570 million will be deposited in the general fund of the U.S. Treasury 

The FY 2018 request seeks to solidify and maintain SEC progress in key areas.  I will now discuss how we propose to use the resources entrusted to us in these areas. 

Effective Agency Management

As the agency’s senior responsible executive, I am committed to ensuring that the SEC is not only a good steward of the funds that you entrust to our use, but also maximizes the value of those funds to the American investor.  I have devoted a significant portion of my first six weeks at the SEC developing a deeper understanding of the agency’s internal operations and management, including how the agency’s divisions and offices interact with investors, markets, and companies.  For FY 2018, the agency will continue to work toward more efficient internal operations, including through automation, streamlined internal processes, and better use of data.  For example, we will continue to develop and leverage our capabilities for risk analysis to inform our decision making, including how most efficiently to use staff resources.  Given the pace of change in today’s capital markets, it is more important than ever that agency operations be nimble so that we can direct resources where they are needed most.

Protecting Investors

The SEC is the first line of defense safeguarding millions of investors, and as Chairman I am committed to protecting and enhancing the most vibrant markets in the world.  The FY 2018 budget will enable the SEC to have a robust program to monitor, investigate, and enforce compliance with the federal securities laws.  Under our request, more than 50% of the requested resources will be invested in the agency’s enforcement and examination programs.  These resources enable the agency to root out fraud and wrongdoing in our financial system.  They also allow us to evaluate broker-dealers, investment advisers, and other regulated entities that interact with investors for compliance with investor protection rules.

This request will enable the SEC to continue the Division of Enforcement’s vigorous efforts to investigate and bring civil charges against violators of the federal securities laws.  Successful enforcement actions impose meaningful sanctions on securities law violators, deter future wrongdoing, and result in disgorgement of ill-gotten gains that can be returned to harmed investors.  The SEC’s enforcement program is led by co-directors Stephanie Avakian, who served as the Enforcement Division’s Deputy Director for the past three years, and Steve Peikin, an experienced former Assistant U.S. Attorney who also served as chief of the securities fraud task force for the Southern District of New York.  In FY 2018, under their leadership, the SEC will continue to focus resources on key areas where misconduct harms investors, undermines confidence, and impairs market integrity.  This includes such critical areas as retail investor fraud and investment professional misconduct, insider trading, market manipulation, and accounting fraud.

Additionally, through our work to enforce the federal securities laws, the Commission regularly obtains orders requiring securities violators to disgorge illegal profits and pay penalties.  In FY 2016, these amounts totaled more than $4 billion.  Our priority is to distribute these funds to harmed investors wherever reasonably possible.

The request will also enable the SEC’s national examination program, led by the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE), to focus on conducting risk-based examinations of registered entities, including broker-dealers, investment advisers, investment companies, municipal advisors, national securities exchanges, SROs, transfer agents, and clearing agencies to evaluate their compliance with applicable regulatory requirements.  This is an example of an area where flexibility is necessary.  Registered investment advisers now manage more than $70 trillion in assets, which is more than three times 2001 levels.  In 2016, the SEC reassigned approximately 100 staff to the national examination program’s investment adviser examination unit.  As a result of this shift and the introduction of efficiencies, the SEC is on track to deliver a 20% increase in the number of investment adviser examinations in the current fiscal year.  For FY 2018, OCIE anticipates being able to deliver a further 5% increase in the number of investment adviser exams.  I expect that for at least the next several years we will need to do more each year to increase the agency’s examination coverage of investment advisers in light of continuing changes in the markets.

In the coming fiscal year, OCIE plans to increase the number of inspections to assess compliance with Commission rules designed to ensure that the cybersecurity infrastructure that is critical to the U.S. securities markets is secure and resilient.  OCIE also will continue to bolster its risk-based approach to exam selection through the continued development of data analytics tools.  These tools help us identify activities that may warrant further examination and efficiently focus our examination efforts.

Facilitating Capital Formation

The SEC performs a critical function for companies seeking to raise capital to grow their businesses.  The SEC’s efforts in this area contribute to job growth and an expanding economy, as well as help ensure that investors – including Main Street Americans – have access to a broad range of investment choices.  The Commission’s rules seek to facilitate offerings by large and small companies engaged in all manner of commerce, while also protecting investors and maintaining confidence in the U.S. capital markets. 

In recent years, the SEC has carried out this responsibility through a number of key initiatives, including most recently in response to the JOBS Act and FAST Act, with a particular emphasis on expanded capital-raising opportunities for smaller businesses.  While much progress has been made, I believe the SEC can and should strive to do more to enhance capital formation particularly (1) for small and emerging companies and (2) in our public capital markets. U.S. capital markets remain the envy of the world, but fewer companies are choosing to enter the public capital markets than in the past, and, as a result, investment opportunities for Main Street investors are more limited.  Your support for our FY 2018 budget request will enable the staff to develop and present to the Commission rulemaking initiatives aimed at promoting firms’ access to capital markets to generate economic growth while fostering important investor protections.  I recently named a new Director of the Division of Corporation Finance, Bill Hinman, who is leading these efforts and working with the staff to develop proposals for consideration.  Bill is a recognized leader with more than three decades of experience advising companies of all sizes in capital-raising and acquisitions.  We share the view that there is no better architecture for fostering capital formation, providing investment opportunities, and protecting investors than our public company disclosure-based system.

The FY 2018 request also will enable the agency to devote resources to staff the new Office of the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation.  In the near future, the SEC plans to commence a nationwide recruitment effort to identify and hire a Small Business Capital Formation Advocate who will serve as the head of this office.  This Office will provide assistance to small businesses and small business investors, conduct outreach to better understand their concerns, and recommend to the Commission ways that the regulatory environment might be improved.  Once the Advocate is on board, your support for our budget request will enable the agency to staff this office in FY 2018.

Leveraging Technology

Our capital markets have become increasingly complex, with advances in technology driving significant changes, including (1) the way that companies solicit investors and sell their securities to the public, (2) the channels through which individuals receive investment advice, and (3) the manner in which institutional and retail investors transact on our markets.  Indeed, technology has contributed to changes in the fundamental structures of markets themselves. 

The FY 2018 budget request will help the SEC to stay on top of these critical developments and promote our mission in an evolving landscape.  The SEC has made progress in modernizing our technology systems, with the benefits of increasing our use of data analytics, increasing program effectiveness, and streamlining operations.  The $240 million that the SEC plans to spend on information technology in FY 2018 is quite modest, by way of comparison, to the amounts that the major Wall Street firms spend on their own information technology systems.  For example, in 2016 one large financial institution alone spent more than $9.5 billion on technology firm-wide, with $3 billion of that dedicated toward new initiatives.  Another large financial institution spent $6.6 billion in 2016 on technology initiatives.

The FY 2018 budget request relies on continued access to the Reserve Fund.  These funds, which have been dedicated to technology, have been important in our efforts to keep pace with the rapid technology advancements occurring in areas regulated by the SEC, as well as meeting emerging cybersecurity challenges.  The continued availability of the Reserve Fund historically has allowed us to commit to critical, long-term technology initiatives that otherwise may have been more difficult for us to execute.

Key technology initiatives that will be supported with our FY 2018 request include: 

  • Expanding data analytics tools to integrate and analyze the large and ever-increasing volume of financial data we receive, enabling us to detect potential fraud or suspicious behavior earlier and allocate resources more effectively;
  • Improving our examination program through risk assessment and surveillance tools that help identify high-risk areas for further examination;
  • Increasing investments in cybersecurity, including strengthening our capabilities for monitoring and avoiding advanced persistent threats;
  • Enhancing additional systems that support our enforcement program, including applying sophisticated algorithms that foster the detection of potential insider trading and manipulation;
  • Improving access and usefulness of information available to the public through our EDGAR electronic filing system; and
  • Investing further in business processes automation and enhancements including the retirement of legacy systems.

Leasing

As this subcommittee is aware, the existing SEC Washington, DC headquarters leases expire in the next few years. In addition to the $1.602 billion request for SEC operations, the budget request includes the $245 million that the General Services Administration (GSA) requires in FY 2018 in order to commence a competitive procurement for a successor headquarters lease. None of these funds would be used for SEC operations.  Rather, these funds represent potential expenses for build-out costs, IT infrastructure, security equipment, and fees if the outcome of GSA’s competitive acquisition process should require the SEC to relocate.  To provide the subcommittee with assurances that the funds will not be used for other purposes, the proposed appropriations language submitted as part of the budget request provides a mechanism whereby these funds would be refunded to fee payers in the event they are not needed for relocation.

Conclusion

Thank you again for the opportunity to present the President’s FY 2018 budget request.  I deeply appreciate the President’s and Congress’ continued support of the agency.  I look forward to working with the subcommittee to ensure that the SEC has the resources needed to fulfill our important responsibilities to investors and our capital markets.  I welcome your comment and would be happy to answer any questions.

 


[1]  The views expressed in this testimony are those of the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not necessarily represent the views of the President, the full Commission, or any Commissioner.  In accordance with past practice, the budget justification of the agency was submitted by the Chairman and was not voted on by the full Commission.

FTC, NHTSA Workshop to Focus on Privacy, Security Issues Related to Connected Cars

WHAT: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) will hold a workshop on June 28, 2017 in Washington, D.C., to examine the consumer privacy and security issues posed by automated and connected vehicles. WHEN: Wednesday June 28, 10:00 a.m.-5:00 pm EDT WHERE: Constitution Center
400 7th St SW
Washington, D.C. 20024 WHO: FTC Acting Chairman Maureen K. Ohlhausen and NHTSA Acting Executive Director Terry T. Shelton, as well as industry representatives, consumer advocates, government officials, and others. WEBCAST: The conference will be webcast. TWITTER: The FTC will live-tweet the event on @FTC using the hashtag #ConnectedCarsFTC. Attendees and viewers are encouraged to join in the discussion.

Defendants Involved in Selling Business Coaching Programs Settle FTC Charges

Seven individuals and eight companies they control have agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges in a deceptive telemarketing operation that took millions of dollars from thousands of consumers who were trying to start home-based Internet businesses. The defendants have agreed to be banned from selling business coaching services and work-at-home opportunities.

As alleged in the FTC’s complaints, the defendants purported to offer consumers business coaching services, but those who signed up were left with no functioning business, little or no earnings, and heavily in debt. Using a variety of alleged deceptive sales tactics, the defendants falsely promised that their clients were likely to earn substantial income, that their training programs were personalized and open only to qualified participants, and that they needed consumers’ financial information to determine if they qualified. After consumers purchased the business coaching services, typically for thousands of dollars, they were targeted with more sales calls to buy more purported business services.

Some of the defendants allegedly provided other telemarketers access to their merchant accounts – an illegal practice known as credit card factoring – to process sales initiated by telemarketers that could not obtain merchant accounts themselves.

The defendants named in one complaint are Ari Monkarsh; Faraz Rouhani; Travis Thomas; Nathan Beeson; Kenneth Dickinson; Lift International LLC; also doing business as Lift International Enterprises LLC, Guidance Interactive, and GoGo Dropship; Professional Learning Institute LLC; Future Education LLC, also d/b/a Pinnacle Learning Institute and Pinnacle Group; Growth Strategy Solutions LLC, also d/b/a Advantage Education, Discover Education, Enterprise Education, and Growth Strategy Solutions Inc.; Advantage Education LLC; Discover Education LLC; and Enterprise Education Inc., also d/b/a Advantage Education.

The defendants in a separate complaint are Matthew Rasmussen; David Rasmussen; and Thrive Learning LLC, also d/b/a Business Education Department, Focus, Lightwave Web Builder, and Thrive Learning Institute. The Rasmussens and Thrive Learning sold the business to Lift International LLC in August 2013.

In addition to the bans imposed on the defendants, the settlements provide for monetary judgments that are partially suspended based on an inability to pay. The order against the Rasmussens and Thrive Learning imposes a $27 million judgment that will be partially suspended upon payment of $1.6 million and the surrender of certain assets. The order against Monkarsh and Lift International imposes a $29 million judgment that will be partially suspended upon payment of $200,000. The order against Rouhani, Thomas, Professional Learning Institute and Future Education imposes a $13 million judgment that will be partially suspended upon payment of $300,000. The order against Beeson, Dickinson, Growth Strategy Solutions, Advantage Education, Discover Education and Enterprise Education imposes a $10.5 million judgment that will be partially suspended upon the surrender of certain assets.

In each order, the full judgment will become due immediately if the defendants are found to have misrepresented their financial condition.

The Commission vote approving the proposed stipulated final orders was 2-0. The U.S. District Court for Utah entered the orders on June 7, 2017 and June 13, 2017.

NOTE: Stipulated final orders have the force of law when approved and signed by the District Court judge.

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more about consumer topics, including business opportunity scams and what you need to know before starting your own business, and file a consumer complaint online or by calling 1-877-FTC-HELP (382-4357). Small business owners can also learn more at ftc.gov/SmallBusiness. Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, read our blogs and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

FTC Requires Retail Fuel Station and Convenience Store Operator Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. to Divest up to 71 Fuel Stations as a Condition of Merger with Competitor CST Brands, Inc.

Retail fuel station and convenience store operator Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. has agreed to divest up to 71 retail fuel stations with convenience stores to Empire Petroleum Partners in order to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that ACT’s proposed $4.4 billion acquisition of competitor CST Brands, Inc. would violate federal antitrust law.   

The divestiture order requires ACT to divest 70 CST fuel stations to Empire, and to give Empire the option of acquiring an additional location owned by ACT. The fuel stations to be divested are in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, New Mexico, Ohio, and Texas.

According to the complaint, the geographic markets for the retail sale of gasoline and diesel are localized, generally ranging from a few blocks to a few miles. The complaint alleges that without a remedy the merger would significantly increase market concentration for the retail sales of gasoline or diesel in each of the 71 local markets, resulting in a monopoly in ten markets and reducing the number of competitors in the rest to two or three.

Retail fuel stations compete on price, convenience store format, product offerings, and location, and they pay close attention to nearby competitors. The complaint alleges that without the divestiture the merger would allow the combined entity to raise prices unilaterally in markets where CST is ACT’s only or closest competitor, and increase the likelihood of coordinated effects in markets where three or two competitors would remain.

Headquartered in Quebec, Canada, ACT operates convenience stores and retail fuel stations worldwide, including nearly 4,700 in United States. Almost all the convenience stores, which operate primarily under the Circle K and Kangaroo Express banners, also sell retail fuel under a variety of company and third-party brands.

San Antonio, Texas-based CST operates 1,146 convenience stores and retail fuel stations in the United States. The convenience stores operate primarily under the Corner Store banner, while the fuel stations generally use the Valero brand.

Under the terms of the consent agreement, ACT has 75 days after the transaction closes or 14 days after the FTC’s consent agreement becomes final to divest to Empire CST’s retail fuel stations in 70 local markets. In Albany, Georgia, ACT’s retail fuel station was damaged by a tornado in early 2017 and the proposed divestiture agreement requires ACT to give Empire the option to buy this damaged site. If Empire declines, the proposed divestiture agreement prohibits ACT, for a period of ten years, from restricting the use of the property as a retail fuel station in any future sale.

Further details about the consent agreement, which includes an asset maintenance order and allows the Commission to appoint a monitor trustee, are set forth in the analysis to aid public comment for this matter.

The Commission vote to issue the complaint and accept the proposed consent order for public comment was 2-0. The FTC will publish the consent agreement package in the Federal Register shortly. The agreement will be subject to public comment for 30 days, beginning today and continuing through July 26, 2017, after which the Commission will decide whether to make the proposed consent order final. Comments can be filed electronically or in paper form by following the instructions in the “Supplementary Information” section of the Federal Register notice.

NOTE: The Commission issues an administrative complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. When the Commission issues a consent order on a final basis, it carries the force of law with respect to future actions. Each violation of such an order may result in a civil penalty of up to $40,654.

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more about how competition benefits consumers or file an antitrust complaint. Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, read our blogs and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

FTC Wraps up Major Phone Cramming Case as Remaining Defendants Settle Charges

The remaining defendants behind a massive landline cramming operation agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that they placed more than $70 million in unauthorized charges on consumers’ phone bills.

The settlements with defendants Steven Sann, Terry Lane, and the corporate defendants who operated the scheme, resolve the remaining charges the FTC brought against American eVoice, Ltd., eight other companies, and four individual defendants.

In its complaint, the FTC alleged that the operation placed charges ranging from $9.95 to $24.95 per month on consumers’ landline phone bills for voicemail services they never signed up for and never even knew they had.

The lead defendant, Sann, his wife Lane, and the corporate defendants have now agreed to settle the FTC’s charges. Robert Braach, an accountant who provided financial and management services for the scheme, settled similar charges in November 2016.

Under the terms of the settlements, the defendants are permanently banned from all telephone billing, landline or mobile. The orders also ban all defendants from unauthorized billing in general.

The settlements with Sann, Lane, and the corporate defendants impose judgments of $41.9 million that are either partially or entirely suspended based on an inability to pay.  Under the terms of the settlements, Sann will have to forfeit more than $500,000 in ill-gotten funds that he used to fund his IRAs, and he will also surrender an Infiniti Q56 and a Nissan 350Z.  Most of Sann’s other assets have already been transferred to the Chapter 7 Trustee administering his bankruptcy estate.  In a parallel criminal case brought by the United States Attorney for the District of Montana, Sann pleaded guilty to criminal charges of money laundering and wire fraud and was sentenced to two years in prison.

The settlement with Braach imposes a judgment of $71 million that was suspended after Braach transferred $75,000 to the Commission.  In the future, if any of the defendants are found to have misrepresented their financial condition, the entire amount of the respective judgment will become due as to those defendants.

The Commission vote approving the proposed stipulated final orders against Sann, Lane, and the corporate defendants was 2-0. It was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana, Missoula Division.

The Commission voted 3-0 to approve the stipulated final order against Braach, and the District Court judge approved and signed it in January 2017.

NOTE:  Stipulated court orders have the force of law when approved and signed by the District Court judge.

For consumer information about cramming, see Mystery Charges on Your Phone Bill.

The FTC appreciates the assistance provided in these cases by the Better Business Bureau Northwest; the Montana Department of Justice; and the Federal Communications Commission.

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers.  You can learn more about consumer topics and file a consumer complaint online or by calling 1-877-FTC-HELP (382-4357).  Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, read our blogs and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

FTC Charges Debt Collection Scheme Took Consumers’ Money for Phantom Debts They Did Not Owe

The Federal Trade Commission has charged a North Carolina debt collection operation and its owner with taking money from consumers for fake debts they did not owe. The action is part of the FTC’s crackdown on “phantom” debt collection.

According to the FTC, Anthony Swatsworth, ACDI Group LLC, and Solutions to Portfolios LLC (ACDI) bought phony payday loan debts – loans supposedly made by “500FastCash” – from SQ Capital through a debt broker, and continued to collect on those debts even after learning the debts were fake and receiving a full refund for their purchase.

Almost immediately after ACDI started collecting on the loans, consumers complained and provided evidence that they had never taken out a 500FastCash loan. Other consumers complained that they did not have an outstanding balance. When the defendants reported the complaints to the broker, the broker returned the defendants’ money and told the defendants to stop collecting on the phony debts. Yet the defendants kept collecting from consumers for at least seven more months.

According to the FTC, since the debts SQ Capital sold were counterfeit, ACDI had no right to collect on them. The defendants are charged with violating the FTC Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

The Commission vote authorizing the staff to file the complaint was 2-0. It was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina.

NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The case will be decided by the court.

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more about consumer topics and file a consumer complaint online or by calling 1-877-FTC-HELP (382-4357). Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, read our blogs and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

FTC Returns Money to Victims of Timeshare Resale Scam

The Federal Trade Commission is mailing 338 checks totaling more than $319,000 to people who lost money to Information Management Forum Inc., which also did business as Vacation Property Marketing, and its owner, Edward Lee Windsor.

The defendants lured consumers into paying “registration fees” for their services by making unsolicited telemarketing calls to timeshare owners and falsely claiming to have renters or buyers lined up for the timeshare property. In 2013, they were banned from selling timeshare resale services, and from telemarketing.

Check recipients will receive full refunds based on information they reported to law enforcement. The average amount is $945.

Recipients should deposit or cash checks within 60 days. If they have questions about the case, they should contact the FTC’s refund administrator, Analytics, at 855-907-3187.

To learn more about the FTC’s refund program, visit www.ftc.gov/refunds.

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more about consumer topics and file a consumer complaint online or by calling 1-877-FTC-HELP (382-4357). Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, read our blogs and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

FTC Announces Regulatory Reform Measures Ranging from TVs and Textiles to Energy Labels and Email

As part of Federal Trade Commission Acting Chairman Maureen K. Ohlhausen’s regulatory reform initiative, the FTC is taking steps to ensure that its rules and guides keep pace with technological advances in the marketplace while continuing the agency’s mission to protect consumers and promote competition without unduly burdening legitimate business.

“Regulations can be important tools in protecting consumers, but when they are outdated, excessive, or unnecessary, they can create significant burdens on the U.S. economy, with little benefit,” said Acting Chairman Ohlhausen. “Private firms face constant market pressure to innovate and improve, and I see no reason why government should operate any differently. American taxpayers should expect nothing less from us,” Ohlhausen further stated.

Today’s announcement addresses the FTC’s Picture Tube Rule, Textile Rules, Energy Labeling Rule, and the CAN-SPAM Rule. Further streamlining may be in store as the FTC continues to conduct its regular, systematic reviews of all of its rules and guides, assessing the continuing need for them, as well as their costs and benefits, both to consumers and businesses.

Picture Tube Rule. The FTC is seeking public comment on the Picture Tube Rule, which requires manufacturers to adopt uniform measurement of television screen sizes to help consumers compare products. Specifically, the agency will be reviewing whether the rule is still needed, as well as the efficiency, costs, benefits and impact of the rule.

Initiated in 1966 and last amended in 1994, the Picture Tube Rule requires advertisers to base any representation of the screen size on the horizontal dimension of the actual, viewable area, unless they disclose the alternative method of measurement clearly and conspicuously.

Among the issues the FTC will consider are changes in television technology including, the incorporation of plasma, LED, OLED, and other similar materials in flat display screens.

The Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the Picture Tube Rule is available on the FTC’s website and as a link to this press release and will be published in the Federal Register soon. Instructions for filing comments appear in the Federal Register Notice. Comments must be received by August 31, 2017; they will be posted at www.ftc.gov/policy/public-comments. (FTC File No. P174200; the staff contact is John Andrew Singer, Bureau of Consumer Protection, 202-326-3234)

Textile Rules. The FTC also is seeking public comment on a proposal to eliminate obsolete provisions of its Textile Labeling Rules, which require marketers to attach a label to a textile product disclosing the manufacturer or marketer name, the country where the product was processed or manufactured, and the generic names and percentages by weight of the fibers in the product.

The Textile Rule allows marketers to disclose a trademark used as a “housemark” (a distinctive mark used to identify all a firm’s products) on the tag in lieu of their business name, but only if they first register their housemark with the Commission. That provision, imposed in 1959, is no longer necessary because trademark owners can easily be identified by searching online or via the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office website.

The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the Textile Rules is available on the FTC’s website and as a link to this press release and will be published in the Federal Register soon. Instructions for filing comments appear in the Federal Register Notice. Comments must be received by July 31, 2017; they will be posted at www.ftc.gov/policy/public-comments. (FTC File No. P948404; the staff contact is Laura Koss, Bureau of Consumer Protection, 202-326-2890)

Energy Labeling Rule. In addition, the FTC is updating its Energy Labeling Rule to eliminate provisions that are obsolete and unnecessarily burdensome and to account for new products in the marketplace.

The Energy Labeling Rule helps consumers consider the energy cost of consumer products by requiring yellow EnergyGuide labels on certain appliances to help consumers compare similar models. Among other things, the labels provide consumers with an estimated annual operating cost and an energy consumption rating.

In September 2016, the FTC sought public comment on proposed changes to the Rule. The changes eliminate obsolete marking requirements for plumbing products, exempt certain ceiling fans from labeling requirements, and update the labels to cover electric instantaneous water heaters. (FTC File No. R611004; the staff contact for final amendments to the Energy Labeling Rule is Hampton Newsome, Bureau of Consumer Protection, 202-326-2889.)

CAN-SPAM Rule. As part of its systematic review of its rules, the FTC also is seeking public comment on its rule implementing the CAN-SPAM Act, a 2003 law that sets requirements for commercial email and gives recipients the right to stop unwanted email. 

The CAN-SPAM (Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act) Rule requires that a commercial e-mail contain accurate header and subject lines, identify itself as an ad, include a valid physical address, and offer recipients a way to opt out of future messages.

The FTC is seeking comment on whether consumers have benefitted from the Rule, whether it should be modified, the costs of compliance, whether it should be amended to account for technological or economic changes, among other things.

The Federal Register notice regarding the CAN-SPAM Rule is available on the FTC’s website and as a link to this press release and will be published in the Federal Register soon. Instructions for filing comments appear in the Federal Register Notice. Comments must be received by August 31, 2017; they will be posted at www.ftc.gov/policy/public-comments. (FTC File No. R711010; the staff contact is Christopher E. Brown, Bureau of Consumer Protection, 202-326-2825)

The Commission vote approving each of these actions was 2-0.

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more about consumer topics and file a consumer complaint online or by calling 1-877-FTC-HELP (382-4357). Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, read our blogs and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

FTC and State Attorney General Challenge Physician Group Acquisition in North Dakota

The Federal Trade Commission has authorized a federal court action to block Sanford Health’s proposed acquisition of Mid Dakota Clinic, alleging that the deal would violate antitrust law by significantly reducing competition for adult primary care physician services, pediatric services, obstetrics and gynecology services, and general surgery physician services in the greater Bismarck and Mandan metropolitan area.

The FTC, jointly with the Office of the Attorney General of North Dakota, has filed a complaint in federal district court seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to stop the deal and to maintain the status quo pending an administrative trial on the merits of the case.

According to the complaint, Sanford and Mid Dakota are each other’s closest rivals in the four-county Bismarck-Mandan region of North Dakota, an area with a population of 125,000.

According to Tad Lipsky, Acting Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition, “This merger is likely to reduce significantly the competitive options available to medical insurance providers, which in turn will lead to deteriorating terms for provision of medical care, including higher prices and lower quality. The parties currently compete to join commercial insurers’ provider networks, stimulating each other to improve their technology, expand services, recruit high-quality physicians and provide patients with convenient and accessible physician and surgical services. The transaction would eliminate that competitive pressure.”

The transaction would create a group of physicians with at least 75 to 85 percent share in the provision of adult primary care physician services, pediatric services, and obstetrics and gynecology services. It would be the only physician group offering general surgery physician services in the affected area, according to the complaint.

The possibility of future entry or expansion of services and facilities by other healthcare providers is unlikely to prevent the competitive harm caused by the acquisition.

Sanford Health is a healthcare system headquartered in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, which operates more than 40 hospitals and 250 clinics in nine U.S. states and several countries. It also sells health insurance in four states, including North Dakota. In the Bismarck-Mandan area, subsidiary Sanford Bismarck operates a 217-bed general acute care hospital and a network of primary care and specialty clinics, employing 160 physicians and 100 non-physician healthcare providers.

Mid Dakota provides primary care services, and specialty medical and surgical services primarily in Bismarck, North Dakota. Mid Dakota employs 61 physicians and 19 advanced practice practitioners and operates six clinics in Bismarck, as well as a Center for Women and an ambulatory surgery center.

The Commission voted 2-0 to issue the administrative complaint, and to authorize staff to seek a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in federal district court. The federal district court complaint has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota. The administrative trial is scheduled to begin on November 28, 2017.

NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The authorization and filing of the court action and the administrative complaint does not constitute a determination that any law has been violated. A federal district court will assess requests for injunctive relief, subject to appellate review. The issuance of the administrative complaint marks the beginning of a proceeding in which the allegations will be tried in a formal hearing before an administrative law judge, subject to further review by the FTC and by federal appellate courts.

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more about how competition benefits consumers or file an antitrust complaint. Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, read our blogs and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

Federal Trade Commission Closes Investigation of Texas Medical Board After Texas Passes Law Expanding Telemedicine and Telehealth Services

The Federal Trade Commission has closed its investigation of whether the Texas Medical Board violated federal antitrust law by adopting rules restricting the practice of telemedicine and telehealth in Texas. The Commission voted to close the investigation after Texas enacted a law that overrides the board’s restrictive rules.

In a statement explaining its reasoning, the Commission commends the State of Texas for using its authority to permit the expansion of telemedicine and telehealth services, and for addressing competitive concerns raised by the Texas Medical Board’s previous regulations that significantly restricted telemedicine and telehealth services in Texas. Acting Chairman Maureen K. Ohlhausen said, “I have long advocated for the expansion of telemedicine and telehealth options that enhance competition and benefit consumers, while still protecting public health and safety. I commend the Governor of Texas and the Texas state legislature for expanding access to health care services for Texans through telehealth and telemedicine.”

The Commission vote to close the investigation was 2-0. (FTC File No. 1510180; the staff contact is Michael Turner, Bureau of Competition, 202-326-3649)

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more about how competition benefits consumers or file an antitrust complaint. Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, read our blogs and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.