Consumer Advice to Ring in the New Year

Nine Consumer Tips to Make the Most of 2009

For Your Information

As 2008 draws to a close, the Federal Trade Commission has nine consumer tips that can yield big dividends next year. Recognizing a good deal, staying safe online, managing credit and debt, and reporting scams and deceptive offers are more important than ever in these uncertain economic times. The FTC’s tips this year include:

  1. Get a free copy of your credit report. Visit www.annualcreditreport.com or call 877-322-8228 to request a free credit report, once every 12 months from each of the nationwide consumer credit reporting companies. AnnualCreditReport.com is the only site consumers can depend on for a truly free credit report with no strings attached. To learn more about credit, mortgages, debt collection, and other financial issues visit www.ftc.gov/credit.
  2. Stay safe online. The Internet provides access to information, entertainment, financial offers – in short, a world of countless products and services. But unless security software is used and kept up-to-date, consumers can be left vulnerable to scammers, identity thieves, phishers, and more. Computer security is available – in plain language – at www.onguardonline.gov.
  3. Deter identity theft. Information packages at www.ftc.gov/idtheft can help deter, detect, and defend against ID theft, and minimize the damage it can cause. Consumers who are concerned that they may be a victim of identity theft can visit www.ftc.gov/idtheft or call 877-ID-THEFT.
  4. Foil a phone fraudster. Criminals use the phone to commit many different types of fraud, including sweepstakes and lottery frauds, loan fraud, buying club memberships, and credit card scams. Find out how to avoid them at www.ftc.gov/phonefraud.
  5. Register a number. The National Do Not Call Registry gives consumers a choice about whether to receive telemarketing calls at home. Legitimate telemarketers should not call phone numbers that have been on the Registry for 31 days. If calls are received, consumers can file a complaint with the FTC. To register a home or mobile phone number for free, visit www.donotcall.gov or call 888-382-1222 from the number to be registered.
  6. Teach a kid about commerce. Take a kid to www.ftc.gov/youarehere – a virtual mall with interactive activities that provide lessons about advertising, marketing, and the benefits of competition. At this free site, kids can design and print advertisements, uncover suspicious claims in an ad, and play games that reveal the secrets behind pricing.
  7. Save your energy. Consumers can save energy and money – whether they are buying a new refrigerator or trying to reduce their home heating and cooling bills. Find out how to save money in virtually every room of the home at www.ftc.gov/energysavings.
  8. Have some healthy skepticism. Consumers can learn how to spot health scams, such as fake cancer cures and bogus weight loss products, and do some research on buying generic drugs, Lasik eye surgery, and using dietary supplements. Consumers can learn about rights they may not even know they had – like the right to obtain a copy of prescriptions for eyeglasses or contact lenses at www.ftc.gov/health.
  9. Report a rip-off. Your complaints can help detect patterns of wrong-doing, and lead to investigations and prosecutions. The FTC enters all complaints it receives into Consumer Sentinel, a secure online database that is used by thousands of civil and criminal law enforcement authorities worldwide. File your complaint at www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,500 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

(FYI nine tips)

Contact Information

MEDIA CONTACT:
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2180

Consumer Advice to Ring in the New Year

Nine Consumer Tips to Make the Most of 2009

For Your Information

As 2008 draws to a close, the Federal Trade Commission has nine consumer tips that can yield big dividends next year. Recognizing a good deal, staying safe online, managing credit and debt, and reporting scams and deceptive offers are more important than ever in these uncertain economic times. The FTC’s tips this year include:

  1. Get a free copy of your credit report. Visit www.annualcreditreport.com or call 877-322-8228 to request a free credit report, once every 12 months from each of the nationwide consumer credit reporting companies. AnnualCreditReport.com is the only site consumers can depend on for a truly free credit report with no strings attached. To learn more about credit, mortgages, debt collection, and other financial issues visit www.ftc.gov/credit.
  2. Stay safe online. The Internet provides access to information, entertainment, financial offers – in short, a world of countless products and services. But unless security software is used and kept up-to-date, consumers can be left vulnerable to scammers, identity thieves, phishers, and more. Computer security is available – in plain language – at www.onguardonline.gov.
  3. Deter identity theft. Information packages at www.ftc.gov/idtheft can help deter, detect, and defend against ID theft, and minimize the damage it can cause. Consumers who are concerned that they may be a victim of identity theft can visit www.ftc.gov/idtheft or call 877-ID-THEFT.
  4. Foil a phone fraudster. Criminals use the phone to commit many different types of fraud, including sweepstakes and lottery frauds, loan fraud, buying club memberships, and credit card scams. Find out how to avoid them at www.ftc.gov/phonefraud.
  5. Register a number. The National Do Not Call Registry gives consumers a choice about whether to receive telemarketing calls at home. Legitimate telemarketers should not call phone numbers that have been on the Registry for 31 days. If calls are received, consumers can file a complaint with the FTC. To register a home or mobile phone number for free, visit www.donotcall.gov or call 888-382-1222 from the number to be registered.
  6. Teach a kid about commerce. Take a kid to www.ftc.gov/youarehere – a virtual mall with interactive activities that provide lessons about advertising, marketing, and the benefits of competition. At this free site, kids can design and print advertisements, uncover suspicious claims in an ad, and play games that reveal the secrets behind pricing.
  7. Save your energy. Consumers can save energy and money – whether they are buying a new refrigerator or trying to reduce their home heating and cooling bills. Find out how to save money in virtually every room of the home at www.ftc.gov/energysavings.
  8. Have some healthy skepticism. Consumers can learn how to spot health scams, such as fake cancer cures and bogus weight loss products, and do some research on buying generic drugs, Lasik eye surgery, and using dietary supplements. Consumers can learn about rights they may not even know they had – like the right to obtain a copy of prescriptions for eyeglasses or contact lenses at www.ftc.gov/health.
  9. Report a rip-off. Your complaints can help detect patterns of wrong-doing, and lead to investigations and prosecutions. The FTC enters all complaints it receives into Consumer Sentinel, a secure online database that is used by thousands of civil and criminal law enforcement authorities worldwide. File your complaint at www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,500 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

(FYI nine tips)

Contact Information

MEDIA CONTACT:
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2180

Inverness Medical Innovations Settles FTC Charges That it Stifled Future Competition in U.S. Market for Consumer Pregnancy Tests

Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc., has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it acted illegally to maintain its monopoly on consumer pregnancy tests in the United States when it acquired certain assets of a smaller competitor, ACON Laboratories, Inc., and interfered with that company’s efforts to develop and supply new consumer pregnancy tests that would compete with Inverness’ products.

The consent order announced today requires Inverness to sell the consumer pregnancy test assets related to water-soluble dye technology that it acquired from ACON and to remove barriers to ACON’s supply of digital consumer pregnancy tests to Inverness’ competitor. The order also limits Inverness’ ability to interfere with future development and supply of digital consumer pregnancy tests.

“Through its actions Inverness removed two important competitive threats to its leading market position in consumer pregnancy tests,” said David P. Wales, Acting Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition. “The Commission’s action today clears the way for more vigorous competition in the future that will benefit consumers through lower prices and more innovation.”

With approximately a 70 percent market share, Inverness is the market leader for U.S. consumer pregnancy tests. Inverness sells several-brand name pregnancy tests, including Clearblue, Accu-Clear, and FactPlus. In 2006, Inverness acquired assets from ACON, including a consumer pregnancy test that ACON was developing based on water-soluble dye technology, and assets related to a digital consumer pregnancy test joint venture that ACON had entered into with another company, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. By buying these assets, Inverness could restrict the development of emerging products that would compete with Inverness’ consumer pregnancy tests.

According to the Commission’s complaint, Inverness acquired these assets from ACON to maintain its monopoly in the pregnancy test market, and acted illegally to stifle future competition from ACON’s joint venture with Church & Dwight in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act.

The complaint charges that Inverness weakened future competition in two main respects. First, it charges that Inverness limited potential competition from digital consumer pregnancy test products by, among other things, 1) imposing a covenant not to compete on ACON, limiting the scope and duration of its joint venture with Church & Dwight; 2) requiring ACON to provide Inverness with all profits from the joint venture; and 3) acquiring rights to certain intellectual property developed by ACON and Church & Dwight during their joint venture. The FTC contends that through these actions, Inverness interfered with ACON’s ability and incentive to develop and manufacture digital consumer pregnancy tests. The consent order prevents Inverness from interfering with ACON and Church & Dwight’s joint venture, and will enable ACON and Church & Dwight to remain competitive after the joint venture ends.

Second, the complaint charges that Inverness engaged in unfair competition to maintain its monopoly when it bought, but did not use, ACON’s water-soluble dye consumer pregnancy test assets. At the time, ACON was one of the only firms developing consumer pregnancy tests using water-soluble dye technology. According to the FTC, the 2006 acquisition of these assets solidified Inverness’ monopoly, and kept that technology from being developed into products that would compete with Inverness’ consumer pregnancy tests. The consent requires Inverness to divest to Aemoh Products, LLC, assets related to ACON’s water-soluble dye product, including its water-soluble dye technology. Under the terms of the order, Inverness also will be prohibited from making infringement claims against certain lateral flow products that use its water-soluble dye technology.

The Commission vote to accept the complaint and consent order and place copies on the public record was 3-0, with Commissioner Pamela Jones Harbour recused. The FTC will publish an announcement regarding the agreement in the Federal Register shortly. The complaint, consent order, and an analysis to aid public comment can be found now on the Commission’s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0610123/index.shtm.

The agreement will be subject to public comment for 30 days, beginning today and continuing through January 20, 2009, after which the Commission will decide whether to make it final. Comments should be addressed to the FTC, Office of the Secretary, Room H-135, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580. The FTC is requesting that any comment filed in paper form near the end of the public comment period be sent by courier or overnight
service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the Washington area and at the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security precautions.

NOTE: A consent agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission of a law violation. When the Commission issues a consent order on a final basis, it carries the force of law with respect to future actions. Each violation of such an order may result in a civil penalty of $11,000.

Copies of the documents related to this matter are available from the FTC’s web site at http://www.ftc.gov and the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580. The FTC’s Bureau of Competition works with the Bureau of Economics to investigate alleged anticompetitive business practices and, when appropriate, recommends that the Commission take law enforcement action. To inform the Bureau about particular business practices, call 202-326-3300, send an e-mail to [email protected], or write to the Office of Policy and Coordination, Room 383, Bureau of Competition, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W., Washington, DC 20580. To learn more about the Bureau of Competition, read “Competition Counts” at http://www.ftc.gov/competitioncounts.

(FTC File No. 061-0123)
(Inverness.final.wpd)

Inverness Medical Innovations Settles FTC Charges That it Stifled Future Competition in U.S. Market for Consumer Pregnancy Tests

Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc., has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it acted illegally to maintain its monopoly on consumer pregnancy tests in the United States when it acquired certain assets of a smaller competitor, ACON Laboratories, Inc., and interfered with that company’s efforts to develop and supply new consumer pregnancy tests that would compete with Inverness’ products.

The consent order announced today requires Inverness to sell the consumer pregnancy test assets related to water-soluble dye technology that it acquired from ACON and to remove barriers to ACON’s supply of digital consumer pregnancy tests to Inverness’ competitor. The order also limits Inverness’ ability to interfere with future development and supply of digital consumer pregnancy tests.

“Through its actions Inverness removed two important competitive threats to its leading market position in consumer pregnancy tests,” said David P. Wales, Acting Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition. “The Commission’s action today clears the way for more vigorous competition in the future that will benefit consumers through lower prices and more innovation.”

With approximately a 70 percent market share, Inverness is the market leader for U.S. consumer pregnancy tests. Inverness sells several-brand name pregnancy tests, including Clearblue, Accu-Clear, and FactPlus. In 2006, Inverness acquired assets from ACON, including a consumer pregnancy test that ACON was developing based on water-soluble dye technology, and assets related to a digital consumer pregnancy test joint venture that ACON had entered into with another company, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. By buying these assets, Inverness could restrict the development of emerging products that would compete with Inverness’ consumer pregnancy tests.

According to the Commission’s complaint, Inverness acquired these assets from ACON to maintain its monopoly in the pregnancy test market, and acted illegally to stifle future competition from ACON’s joint venture with Church & Dwight in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act.

The complaint charges that Inverness weakened future competition in two main respects. First, it charges that Inverness limited potential competition from digital consumer pregnancy test products by, among other things, 1) imposing a covenant not to compete on ACON, limiting the scope and duration of its joint venture with Church & Dwight; 2) requiring ACON to provide Inverness with all profits from the joint venture; and 3) acquiring rights to certain intellectual property developed by ACON and Church & Dwight during their joint venture. The FTC contends that through these actions, Inverness interfered with ACON’s ability and incentive to develop and manufacture digital consumer pregnancy tests. The consent order prevents Inverness from interfering with ACON and Church & Dwight’s joint venture, and will enable ACON and Church & Dwight to remain competitive after the joint venture ends.

Second, the complaint charges that Inverness engaged in unfair competition to maintain its monopoly when it bought, but did not use, ACON’s water-soluble dye consumer pregnancy test assets. At the time, ACON was one of the only firms developing consumer pregnancy tests using water-soluble dye technology. According to the FTC, the 2006 acquisition of these assets solidified Inverness’ monopoly, and kept that technology from being developed into products that would compete with Inverness’ consumer pregnancy tests. The consent requires Inverness to divest to Aemoh Products, LLC, assets related to ACON’s water-soluble dye product, including its water-soluble dye technology. Under the terms of the order, Inverness also will be prohibited from making infringement claims against certain lateral flow products that use its water-soluble dye technology.

The Commission vote to accept the complaint and consent order and place copies on the public record was 3-0, with Commissioner Pamela Jones Harbour recused. The FTC will publish an announcement regarding the agreement in the Federal Register shortly. The complaint, consent order, and an analysis to aid public comment can be found now on the Commission’s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0610123/index.shtm.

The agreement will be subject to public comment for 30 days, beginning today and continuing through January 20, 2009, after which the Commission will decide whether to make it final. Comments should be addressed to the FTC, Office of the Secretary, Room H-135, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580. The FTC is requesting that any comment filed in paper form near the end of the public comment period be sent by courier or overnight
service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the Washington area and at the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security precautions.

NOTE: A consent agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission of a law violation. When the Commission issues a consent order on a final basis, it carries the force of law with respect to future actions. Each violation of such an order may result in a civil penalty of $11,000.

Copies of the documents related to this matter are available from the FTC’s web site at http://www.ftc.gov and the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580. The FTC’s Bureau of Competition works with the Bureau of Economics to investigate alleged anticompetitive business practices and, when appropriate, recommends that the Commission take law enforcement action. To inform the Bureau about particular business practices, call 202-326-3300, send an e-mail to [email protected], or write to the Office of Policy and Coordination, Room 383, Bureau of Competition, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W., Washington, DC 20580. To learn more about the Bureau of Competition, read “Competition Counts” at http://www.ftc.gov/competitioncounts.

(FTC File No. 061-0123)
(Inverness.final.wpd)

Commission Approves Federal Register Notice Adjusting Civil Penalty Amounts

The FTC has approved a Federal Register notice amending Commission Rule 1.98 to adjust its civil penalty dollar amounts in accordance with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (the Act). As detailed in the notice, which will be published shortly and is available now on the Commission’s Web site and as a link to this press release, the Act requires the FTC to make certain regulatory adjustments to civil penalty amounts within its jurisdiction at least once every four years. The Commission published the original adjustments in 1996, and in 2000 the law warranted no adjustments. The Commission also published adjustments to civil penalties under the Clayton Act and the Energy Policy and Conservation Act in 2004.

The notice amends Rule 1.98 to indicate the civil penalty adjustments made this year. Adjustments to the civil penalty amounts are based on the increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) between June of the year in which the prior adjustment was made and June of the year before the current adjustment is being made. Using these percentage changes as appropriate, the FTC is adjusting civil penalty amounts as follows:

  • from $11,000 to $16,000 for civil penalties regarding premerger filing notification violations under the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Improvements Act, section 7A(g)(1) of the Clayton Act;
  • from $6,500 to $7,500 for violations of cease-and-desist orders issued under section 11(l) of the Clayton Act;
  • from $11,000 to $16,000 for unfair or deceptive acts or practices under section 5(l) of the FTC Act;
  • from $11,000 to $16,000 for unfair or deceptive acts or practices under section 5(m)(1)(A) of the FTC Act;
  • from $11,000 to $16,000 for unfair or deceptive acts or practices under section 5(m)(1)(B) of the FTC Act;
  • from $6,500 to $7,500 for recycled oil labeling violations under section 525(a) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act;
  • from $11,000 to $16,000 for energy conservation violations under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, section 525(b); and
  • from $2,500 to $3,500 for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, section 621(a)(2).

The vote approving the Federal Register notice was 4-0. The changes will become effective 30 days after the notice is published in the Federal Register. (FTC File No. P859907; the staff contact is Kathleen R. Johnson, Office of General Counsel, 202-326-2869.)

Copies of the documents mentioned in this release are available from the FTC’s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580. Call toll-free: 1-877-FTC-HELP.

(FYI 62.2008.wpd)

Commission Approves Federal Register Notice Adjusting Civil Penalty Amounts

The FTC has approved a Federal Register notice amending Commission Rule 1.98 to adjust its civil penalty dollar amounts in accordance with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (the Act). As detailed in the notice, which will be published shortly and is available now on the Commission’s Web site and as a link to this press release, the Act requires the FTC to make certain regulatory adjustments to civil penalty amounts within its jurisdiction at least once every four years. The Commission published the original adjustments in 1996, and in 2000 the law warranted no adjustments. The Commission also published adjustments to civil penalties under the Clayton Act and the Energy Policy and Conservation Act in 2004.

The notice amends Rule 1.98 to indicate the civil penalty adjustments made this year. Adjustments to the civil penalty amounts are based on the increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) between June of the year in which the prior adjustment was made and June of the year before the current adjustment is being made. Using these percentage changes as appropriate, the FTC is adjusting civil penalty amounts as follows:

  • from $11,000 to $16,000 for civil penalties regarding premerger filing notification violations under the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Improvements Act, section 7A(g)(1) of the Clayton Act;
  • from $6,500 to $7,500 for violations of cease-and-desist orders issued under section 11(l) of the Clayton Act;
  • from $11,000 to $16,000 for unfair or deceptive acts or practices under section 5(l) of the FTC Act;
  • from $11,000 to $16,000 for unfair or deceptive acts or practices under section 5(m)(1)(A) of the FTC Act;
  • from $11,000 to $16,000 for unfair or deceptive acts or practices under section 5(m)(1)(B) of the FTC Act;
  • from $6,500 to $7,500 for recycled oil labeling violations under section 525(a) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act;
  • from $11,000 to $16,000 for energy conservation violations under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, section 525(b); and
  • from $2,500 to $3,500 for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, section 621(a)(2).

The vote approving the Federal Register notice was 4-0. The changes will become effective 30 days after the notice is published in the Federal Register. (FTC File No. P859907; the staff contact is Kathleen R. Johnson, Office of General Counsel, 202-326-2869.)

Copies of the documents mentioned in this release are available from the FTC’s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580. Call toll-free: 1-877-FTC-HELP.

(FYI 62.2008.wpd)

FTC Files Comment with Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission About Retail Electricity Pricing and Customer Participation

The FTC has approved the filing of a comment with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PA PUC) concerning the PA PUC’s implementation plan for its Energy Efficiency and Conservation Program. The comment also replies to the November 18, 2008, presentation made by the Retail Energy Supply Association (RESA) at the PA PUC’s en banc hearing on demand-side response, energy efficiency, and conservation.

According to the FTC comment, dynamic power pricing and demand response involve customers in addressing electric power systems’ most pressing problems, and this has “the potential to enhance consumer welfare and increase economic efficiency at both the wholesale and retail levels.” The Commission commends the Pennsylvania Legislature and the PA PUC for taking the initiative on these important topics, and states that “[m]ore efficient pricing, advanced metering, and improvements in the technology used to determine when (and how much) energy is consumed are all critical to the future performance of the power industry in Pennsylvania and in the United States as whole.”

The comment states that while many of the specific questions proposed at the hearing pertained to Conservation Service Providers, the FTC recommends that these questions be framed in the context of empowering consumers to manage their peak and overall electric power consumption. The comment thus describes several aspects of encouraging demand-side participation, energy efficiency, and conservation as ways to deliver consumer benefits.

The comment also gives examples of how well-designed dynamic pricing and demand response programs can enlist consumers to help meet important challenges facing the power system.

The FTC summarizes its recommendations by stating that the PA PUC should: 1) encourage real-time or other dynamic pricing programs that increase economic efficiency; 2) urge utilities to design and market dynamic pricing programs that appeal to customers; 3) eliminate regulatory provisions that financially penalize power suppliers if they facilitate efficient dynamic pricing; 4) offer fair standby pricing policies for customers with onsite generation investments; and 5) advocate for demand response bid flexibility. The FTC comment states that “[d]ynamic pricing and demand response programs can be powerful tools to empower customers to help manage peak and overall load.”

The Commission vote approving the filing of the comment was 4-0. It was submitted to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission on December 17, 2008. (FTC File No. V090001; the staff contact is John H. Seesel, Associate General Counsel for Energy, Office of the General Counsel, 202-326-2702.)

Copies of the documents mentioned in this release are available from the FTC’s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580. Call toll-free: 1-877-FTC-HELP.

(FYI 62.2008.wpd)

FTC Files Comment with Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission About Retail Electricity Pricing and Customer Participation

The FTC has approved the filing of a comment with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PA PUC) concerning the PA PUC’s implementation plan for its Energy Efficiency and Conservation Program. The comment also replies to the November 18, 2008, presentation made by the Retail Energy Supply Association (RESA) at the PA PUC’s en banc hearing on demand-side response, energy efficiency, and conservation.

According to the FTC comment, dynamic power pricing and demand response involve customers in addressing electric power systems’ most pressing problems, and this has “the potential to enhance consumer welfare and increase economic efficiency at both the wholesale and retail levels.” The Commission commends the Pennsylvania Legislature and the PA PUC for taking the initiative on these important topics, and states that “[m]ore efficient pricing, advanced metering, and improvements in the technology used to determine when (and how much) energy is consumed are all critical to the future performance of the power industry in Pennsylvania and in the United States as whole.”

The comment states that while many of the specific questions proposed at the hearing pertained to Conservation Service Providers, the FTC recommends that these questions be framed in the context of empowering consumers to manage their peak and overall electric power consumption. The comment thus describes several aspects of encouraging demand-side participation, energy efficiency, and conservation as ways to deliver consumer benefits.

The comment also gives examples of how well-designed dynamic pricing and demand response programs can enlist consumers to help meet important challenges facing the power system.

The FTC summarizes its recommendations by stating that the PA PUC should: 1) encourage real-time or other dynamic pricing programs that increase economic efficiency; 2) urge utilities to design and market dynamic pricing programs that appeal to customers; 3) eliminate regulatory provisions that financially penalize power suppliers if they facilitate efficient dynamic pricing; 4) offer fair standby pricing policies for customers with onsite generation investments; and 5) advocate for demand response bid flexibility. The FTC comment states that “[d]ynamic pricing and demand response programs can be powerful tools to empower customers to help manage peak and overall load.”

The Commission vote approving the filing of the comment was 4-0. It was submitted to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission on December 17, 2008. (FTC File No. V090001; the staff contact is John H. Seesel, Associate General Counsel for Energy, Office of the General Counsel, 202-326-2702.)

Copies of the documents mentioned in this release are available from the FTC’s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580. Call toll-free: 1-877-FTC-HELP.

(FYI 62.2008.wpd)

FTC Issues Third Interim Report to Congresson Results of Studies Required by FACT Act

For Your Information

The Federal Trade Commission has issued an interim report to Congress under Section 319 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, which requires the FTC to study the accuracy and completeness of information in consumers’ credit reports and to consider methods for improving the accuracy and completeness of such information. The requirement includes five interim reports (every two years from December 2004) and a final report in 2014. The current report (attached) is the third interim report.

The previous interim report to Congress (December 2006) reviewed the results of an initial pilot study designed for testing a potential methodology for a nationwide survey, and it proposed a second pilot study to address certain problems uncovered in the first study. In both pilot studies, randomly selected consumers reviewed their credit reports with an expert to identify potential errors, and then disputed potential errors that the expert believed could have a material effect on their credit standing. The current report explains the methodological improvements tested in this second pilot study. As a next step, in 2009 FTC staff plans to submit a proposal, subject to approval by the Office of Management and Budget, for a nationwide study assessing credit report accuracy.

The Commission’s goal is to conduct a nationwide survey of credit reports that is based on a nationally representative sample, uses a reliable method for identifying errors and omissions, and categorizes errors by type and seriousness in terms of potential consumer harm. The Commission vote authorizing staff to issue the report to Congress was 4-0.

(FACTA accuracy)
(FTC File No. P044804)

Contact Information

MEDIA CONTACT:
Frank Dorman,
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2674
STAFF CONTACT:
Peter J. Vander Nat,
Bureau of Economics
202-326-3518

FTC Issues Third Interim Report to Congresson Results of Studies Required by FACT Act

For Your Information

The Federal Trade Commission has issued an interim report to Congress under Section 319 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, which requires the FTC to study the accuracy and completeness of information in consumers’ credit reports and to consider methods for improving the accuracy and completeness of such information. The requirement includes five interim reports (every two years from December 2004) and a final report in 2014. The current report (attached) is the third interim report.

The previous interim report to Congress (December 2006) reviewed the results of an initial pilot study designed for testing a potential methodology for a nationwide survey, and it proposed a second pilot study to address certain problems uncovered in the first study. In both pilot studies, randomly selected consumers reviewed their credit reports with an expert to identify potential errors, and then disputed potential errors that the expert believed could have a material effect on their credit standing. The current report explains the methodological improvements tested in this second pilot study. As a next step, in 2009 FTC staff plans to submit a proposal, subject to approval by the Office of Management and Budget, for a nationwide study assessing credit report accuracy.

The Commission’s goal is to conduct a nationwide survey of credit reports that is based on a nationally representative sample, uses a reliable method for identifying errors and omissions, and categorizes errors by type and seriousness in terms of potential consumer harm. The Commission vote authorizing staff to issue the report to Congress was 4-0.

(FACTA accuracy)
(FTC File No. P044804)

Contact Information

MEDIA CONTACT:
Frank Dorman,
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2674
STAFF CONTACT:
Peter J. Vander Nat,
Bureau of Economics
202-326-3518