FTC to Hold Public Workshop on Proposed Business Opportunity Rule Changes

The Federal Trade Commission will hold a day-long public workshop on June 1, 2009 in Washington, DC, to explore proposed changes to the FTC’s Business Opportunity Rule. The workshop, which is free and open to the public, will examine possible changes to the rule that were outlined in a Revised Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (RNPR) on March 26, 2008.

The workshop will primarily explore issues relating to the effectiveness of a proposed one-page Business Opportunities Disclosure Form that sellers of business opportunities would be required to provide to prospective purchasers. The proposed Disclosure Form is intended to provide prospective purchasers with information they can use to make an informed decision about the potential business opportunity, including information about earnings claims, legal actions, existence of cancellation or refund policies, and references. The workshop also will address general issues raised in comments that have been submitted to the FTC in response to the proposed rulemaking. A more detailed agenda will be published at a later date, before the scheduled workshop.

Business opportunity ventures include vending machine routes, rack display operations, and medical billing ventures. The FTC’s new proposed rule is aimed at protecting consumers from bogus business opportunities while minimizing compliance costs for legitimate businesses.

The workshop will be held from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the FTC’s satellite building conference center, located at 601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC. All attendees will be required to display a current driver’s license or other form of photo identification for entry.

The Commission will be accepting comments on the topics to be covered at the workshop until June 15, 2009. The FTC staff also invites interested parties to submit requests to be panelists by May 4, 2009. Interested parties should include a statement detailing their expertise on the issues to be addressed at the workshop and their complete contact information. Requests to participate filed in an electronic form should be sent to: [email protected].

Reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities are available upon request. Requests for such accommodations should be submitted via e-mail to: [email protected] or by calling Carrie McGlothin at 202-326-3388. Such requests should include a detailed description of the accommodations needed and a way to contact you if we need more information. Please provide advance notice.

The Commission vote approving publication of the Federal Register Notice announcing the workshop was 4-0.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,500 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

(FTC File No. R511993)
(BizOppWorkshop)

FTC to Hold Public Workshop on Proposed Business Opportunity Rule Changes

The Federal Trade Commission will hold a day-long public workshop on June 1, 2009 in Washington, DC, to explore proposed changes to the FTC’s Business Opportunity Rule. The workshop, which is free and open to the public, will examine possible changes to the rule that were outlined in a Revised Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (RNPR) on March 26, 2008.

The workshop will primarily explore issues relating to the effectiveness of a proposed one-page Business Opportunities Disclosure Form that sellers of business opportunities would be required to provide to prospective purchasers. The proposed Disclosure Form is intended to provide prospective purchasers with information they can use to make an informed decision about the potential business opportunity, including information about earnings claims, legal actions, existence of cancellation or refund policies, and references. The workshop also will address general issues raised in comments that have been submitted to the FTC in response to the proposed rulemaking. A more detailed agenda will be published at a later date, before the scheduled workshop.

Business opportunity ventures include vending machine routes, rack display operations, and medical billing ventures. The FTC’s new proposed rule is aimed at protecting consumers from bogus business opportunities while minimizing compliance costs for legitimate businesses.

The workshop will be held from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the FTC’s satellite building conference center, located at 601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC. All attendees will be required to display a current driver’s license or other form of photo identification for entry.

The Commission will be accepting comments on the topics to be covered at the workshop until June 15, 2009. The FTC staff also invites interested parties to submit requests to be panelists by May 4, 2009. Interested parties should include a statement detailing their expertise on the issues to be addressed at the workshop and their complete contact information. Requests to participate filed in an electronic form should be sent to: [email protected].

Reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities are available upon request. Requests for such accommodations should be submitted via e-mail to: [email protected] or by calling Carrie McGlothin at 202-326-3388. Such requests should include a detailed description of the accommodations needed and a way to contact you if we need more information. Please provide advance notice.

The Commission vote approving publication of the Federal Register Notice announcing the workshop was 4-0.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,500 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

(FTC File No. R511993)
(BizOppWorkshop)

Kellogg Settles FTC Charges That Ads for Frosted Mini-Wheats Were False

Kellogg Company, the world’s leading producer of cereal, has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that advertising claims touting a breakfast of Frosted Mini-Wheats as “clinically shown to improve kids’ attentiveness by nearly 20%” were false and violated federal law. The proposed settlement bars deceptive or misleading cognitive health claims for Kellogg’s breakfast foods and snack foods and bars the company from misrepresenting any tests or studies.

According to the FTC’s complaint, Kellogg claimed in a national advertising campaign – including television, print, and Internet advertising, as well as product packaging – that a breakfast of Frosted Mini-Wheats cereal is clinically shown to improve children’s attentiveness by nearly 20 percent. The complaint alleges that, in fact, according to the clinical study referred to in Kellogg’s advertising, only about half the children who ate Frosted Mini-Wheats for breakfast showed any improvement in attentiveness, and only about one in nine improved by 20 percent or more.

The complaint also challenges the claim, made in a different television ad, that a breakfast of Frosted Mini-Wheats was clinically shown to improve children’s attentiveness by nearly 20 percent when compared to children who ate no breakfast. In fact, the study showed that the children who ate the cereal for breakfast averaged just under 11 percent better in attentiveness, by comparison, and that relatively few were nearly 20 percent more attentive. Based on the clinical study results, the complaint alleges that both of the challenged claims are false and violate the FTC Act.

“We tell consumers that they should deal with trusted national brands,” said Chairman Jon Leibowitz. “So it’s especially important that America’s leading companies are more ‘attentive’ to the truthfulness of their ads and don’t exaggerate the results of tests or research. In the future, the Commission will certainly be more attentive to national advertisers.”

The proposed settlement would bar Kellogg from making comparable claims about Frosted Mini-Wheats unless the claims are true and not misleading. It requires that claims about the benefits to cognitive health, process, or function provided by Frosted Mini-Wheats or any morning food or snack food be substantiated and true. The settlement would prohibit Kellogg from misrepresenting the results of tests, studies, or research regarding any morning or snack food product. Finally, the settlement contains standard record-keeping provisions to allow the agency to monitor compliance.

The Commission vote to approve the administrative complaint and proposed consent agreement was 4-0. The FTC will publish an announcement regarding the agreement in the Federal Register shortly. The agreement will be subject to public comment for 30 days, beginning today and continuing through May 19, 2009, after which the Commission will decide whether to make it final. To file a public comment, please click on the following hyperlink: http://www.ftc.gov/os/2009/04/0823145publiccomment.pdf and follow the instructions at that site.

Copies of the complaint, the proposed consent agreement, and an analysis of the agreement to aid in public comment are available from both the FTC’s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580.

NOTE: A consent agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission of a law violation. When the Commission issues a consent order on a final basis, it carries the force of law with respect to future actions. Each violation of such an order may result in a civil penalty of $16,000.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,500 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

(FTC File No. 0823145)
(Kellogg.wpd)

Commission Approves Federal Register Notice Seeking Comments on Cooling-Off Rule; Commission Approves Final Consent Order in Matter of American Telecom Services, Inc.

Commission Approves Federal Register Notice Seeking Comments on Cooling-Off Rule

The Commission has approved a Federal Register notice seeking public comments on the costs and benefits of the agency’s Cooling-Off Rule, as part of its systematic review of its rules and guides. Put in place in 1972, the Cooling-Off Rule was last amended in October 1995. The Rule makes it an unfair and deceptive practice for anyone engaged in the “door-to-door” sale of consumer goods or services with a purchase price of $25 or more to fail to provide a buyer with certain oral and written disclosures regarding the buyer’s right to cancel within three business days when transaction occurred.

The Rule also requires such sellers, within 10 businesses days of receiving a valid cancellation notice, to honor the buyer’s request by refunding all payments, returning any traded-in property, cancelling and returning any security interests created by the sale, and notifying the buyer whether the seller intends to repossess or abandon any shipped goods. The Rule also requires door-to-door sellers to provide the buyer with a completed receipt and a copy of the sales contract.

As detailed in the Federal Register notice, which will be published soon and can be found now as a link to this press release on the Commission’s Web site, the FTC is seeking comments on whether modifications to the Rule are needed to increase its benefits, reduce its costs, or address relevant changes in technology or economic conditions. The notice also explains how to submit comments, which the Commission must receive by June 22, 2009. The Commission vote approving publication of the Federal Register notice was 4-0. (FTC File No. P087109; the staff contact is Sana Coleman Chriss, FTC Southeast Region, Atlanta, 404-656-1364.)

Commission Approves Final Consent Order in Matter of American Telecom Services, Inc.

– Following a public comment period, the Commission has approved a final consent order in the matter of American Telecom Services, Inc. The vote approving the final order was 4-0. (FTC File No. 082-3114; the staff contact is Linda K. Badger, FTC Western Region, San Francisco, 415-848-5151; see press release dated March 11, 2009, at http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/03/ats.shtm.)

Copies of the documents mentioned in this release are available from the FTC’s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580. Call toll-free: 1-877-FTC-HELP.

(FYI 19.2009.wpd)

DIRECTV, Comcast to Pay Total of $3.21 Million for Entity-Specific Do Not Call Violations

Satellite television provider DIRECTV, and Comcast Corp., one of the nation’s largest providers of cable and Internet services, have agreed to pay a total of $3.21 million to settle separate Federal Trade Commission charges that they violated the Do Not Call provisions of the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR), including charges that they or their telemarketers called consumers who specifically had told the companies not to call them again. In addition, a DIRECTV telemarketer and its principals have agreed to pay a $115,000 penalty for making prerecorded sales calls to consumers who had asked not to be called.

Under the proposed settlements announced today, DIRECTV has agreed to pay $2.31 million to settle the FTC’s charges that it violated the TSR’s Do Not Call provisions and, as a result, violated a 2005 court order barring it from such conduct. Comcast has agreed to pay $900,000 to settle the FTC’s claims that it violated the entity-specific Do Not Call provisions of the TSR. All the defendants also would be prohibited from future violations of the TSR and the Do Not Call Rule. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed the actions on behalf of the FTC.

“In both of these cases, DIRECTV and Comcast violated consumers’ privacy by calling people who specifically had asked these companies not to call them again,” said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz. “What makes DIRECTV’s actions especially troubling is that it is a two-time offender: DIRECTV violated not only the FTC’s Do Not Call Rules, but also a previous federal court order barring it from exactly this type of conduct. Simply put, we won’t tolerate firms that disregard consumers’ specific requests not to be called, and we will be especially tough on companies that ignore their obligations under prior court orders.”

Combined with the $5.3 million DIRECTV paid under the earlier 2005 Do Not Call order, the company has now agreed to pay a total of more than $7.6 million for Do Not Call violations. A DIRECTV telemarketer and its principals also are settling related charges.

They would be required to pay a $115,000 penalty for calling consumers who had asked not to be called, and for “abandoning” calls – delivering a prerecorded message when consumers answered, rather than connecting them to a live sales representative.

The Commission’s complaint against Comcast is the first to have as its sole allegation that a company called consumers who had specifically asked it not to call them – the so-called “entity-specific” Do Not Call provision of the TSR.

In another recent Do Not Call enforcement action, last month the Commission announced a complaint against Dish Network (formerly known as Echostar) and two of its telemarketers alleging that they violated the Do Not Call Rule by calling consumers whose phone numbers are on the National Do Not Call Registry. Those cases are currently pending in court.

DIRECTV. According to the FTC, DIRECTV violated the TSR and a 2005 federal court order by causing one of its telemarketers, Voicecast Systems, which operated under the name InTouch Solutions (InTouch), and its two principals to make more than a million calls delivering prerecorded messages to consumers in August and September 2007. InTouch’s telemarketing campaign was designed to contact consumers who had previously asked DIRECTV not to call them again – that is, asked DIRECTV to place them on the company’s internal Do Not Call list. The illegal calls consisted entirely of prerecorded messages in which consumers were told that “from time to time [DIRECTV] extend[s] exciting offers to our loyal customers like you, but because you are on the DIRECTV Do Not Call List, we are not able to contact you for these exciting offers.” The message then told call recipients to “press one” to remove their numbers from the company’s Do Not Call list.

Based on these calls, the Commission charged DIRECTV and InTouch with violating two provisions of the TSR by placing prerecorded calls to consumers who had previously said they did not want the company calling them. The calls allegedly violated the TSR’s provisions against calling consumers on DIRECTV’s internal Do Not Call list and against making calls that do not connect to a live person. To settle these charges, the parties have agreed to stipulated court orders that would permanently bar DIRECTV, InTouch, and InTouch’s principals from violating the TSR in the future, and impose extended monitoring provisions on DIRECTV based on its violation of the 2005 court order. The stipulated orders would also impose a $2.31 million civil penalty against DIRECTV and a $115,000 penalty against InTouch and its principals.

Comcast. The FTC alleges that Comcast caused its in-house call centers, as well as outside telemarketing contractors, to make telemarketing calls to sell Comcast’s cable television, Internet, and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) telephone services. Comcast does have written policies and procedures for compliance by its internal call centers and third-party telemarketers with the TSR, including the Rule’s entity-specific Do Not Call provisions. Despite these policies and procedures, the FTC contends that some of Comcast’s internal call centers and third-party telemarketing vendors together made more than 900,000 calls to consumers after those consumers specifically asked that the company stop calling them.

The Commission alleged that Comcast failed to implement a TSR-compliant Do Not Call program that would have identified problems at internal call centers and third-party telemarketing vendors and promptly corrected them. The FTC did not charge Comcast with calling consumers whose numbers are on the National Do Not Call Registry, but found its entity-specific Do Not Call violations serious and pervasive enough to warrant a complaint.

The proposed stipulated court order settling the Commission’s charges against Comcast would bar the company from violating the TSR in the future, including its entity-specific Do Not Call provisions, and imposes a civil penalty of $900,000. The proposed order also contains standard record-keeping and monitoring provisions to ensure Comcast’s compliance with its terms.

The FTC reminds businesses that compliance with the National Do Not Call Registry alone is not enough – they also need to make sure that they honor consumers’ company-specific Do Not Call requests.

The Commission vote approving each complaint and stipulated court order was 4-0. DOJ filed the complaints on the FTC’s behalf on April 15, 2009. DOJ will file the stipulated orders with DIRECTV, Inc., Voicecast Systems, Inc., also doing business as InTouch Solutions, and its principals Michael Kurtz and Keyvan Saedi in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division. The complaint and proposed order with Comcast Corporation have been submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

NOTE: The Commission authorizes the filing of complaints when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaints are not a finding or ruling that the defendants actually have violated the law.

NOTE: Stipulated court orders are for settlement purposes only and do not necessarily constitute an admission by the defendants of a law violation. Stipulated orders have the force of law when signed by the judge.

Copies of the complaints and proposed court orders are available from the FTC’s web site at http://www.ftc.gov and also from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,500 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

(FTC File Nos. 092-3098 – DirecTV and 062-3166 – Comcast; Civ. Nos. CV09-2605 and 2:09-cv-1589)

DIRECTV, Comcast to Pay Total of $3.21 Million for Entity-Specific Do Not Call Violations

Satellite television provider DIRECTV, and Comcast Corp., one of the nation’s largest providers of cable and Internet services, have agreed to pay a total of $3.21 million to settle separate Federal Trade Commission charges that they violated the Do Not Call provisions of the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR), including charges that they or their telemarketers called consumers who specifically had told the companies not to call them again. In addition, a DIRECTV telemarketer and its principals have agreed to pay a $115,000 penalty for making prerecorded sales calls to consumers who had asked not to be called.

Under the proposed settlements announced today, DIRECTV has agreed to pay $2.31 million to settle the FTC’s charges that it violated the TSR’s Do Not Call provisions and, as a result, violated a 2005 court order barring it from such conduct. Comcast has agreed to pay $900,000 to settle the FTC’s claims that it violated the entity-specific Do Not Call provisions of the TSR. All the defendants also would be prohibited from future violations of the TSR and the Do Not Call Rule. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed the actions on behalf of the FTC.

“In both of these cases, DIRECTV and Comcast violated consumers’ privacy by calling people who specifically had asked these companies not to call them again,” said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz. “What makes DIRECTV’s actions especially troubling is that it is a two-time offender: DIRECTV violated not only the FTC’s Do Not Call Rules, but also a previous federal court order barring it from exactly this type of conduct. Simply put, we won’t tolerate firms that disregard consumers’ specific requests not to be called, and we will be especially tough on companies that ignore their obligations under prior court orders.”

Combined with the $5.3 million DIRECTV paid under the earlier 2005 Do Not Call order, the company has now agreed to pay a total of more than $7.6 million for Do Not Call violations. A DIRECTV telemarketer and its principals also are settling related charges.

They would be required to pay a $115,000 penalty for calling consumers who had asked not to be called, and for “abandoning” calls – delivering a prerecorded message when consumers answered, rather than connecting them to a live sales representative.

The Commission’s complaint against Comcast is the first to have as its sole allegation that a company called consumers who had specifically asked it not to call them – the so-called “entity-specific” Do Not Call provision of the TSR.

In another recent Do Not Call enforcement action, last month the Commission announced a complaint against Dish Network (formerly known as Echostar) and two of its telemarketers alleging that they violated the Do Not Call Rule by calling consumers whose phone numbers are on the National Do Not Call Registry. Those cases are currently pending in court.

DIRECTV. According to the FTC, DIRECTV violated the TSR and a 2005 federal court order by causing one of its telemarketers, Voicecast Systems, which operated under the name InTouch Solutions (InTouch), and its two principals to make more than a million calls delivering prerecorded messages to consumers in August and September 2007. InTouch’s telemarketing campaign was designed to contact consumers who had previously asked DIRECTV not to call them again – that is, asked DIRECTV to place them on the company’s internal Do Not Call list. The illegal calls consisted entirely of prerecorded messages in which consumers were told that “from time to time [DIRECTV] extend[s] exciting offers to our loyal customers like you, but because you are on the DIRECTV Do Not Call List, we are not able to contact you for these exciting offers.” The message then told call recipients to “press one” to remove their numbers from the company’s Do Not Call list.

Based on these calls, the Commission charged DIRECTV and InTouch with violating two provisions of the TSR by placing prerecorded calls to consumers who had previously said they did not want the company calling them. The calls allegedly violated the TSR’s provisions against calling consumers on DIRECTV’s internal Do Not Call list and against making calls that do not connect to a live person. To settle these charges, the parties have agreed to stipulated court orders that would permanently bar DIRECTV, InTouch, and InTouch’s principals from violating the TSR in the future, and impose extended monitoring provisions on DIRECTV based on its violation of the 2005 court order. The stipulated orders would also impose a $2.31 million civil penalty against DIRECTV and a $115,000 penalty against InTouch and its principals.

Comcast. The FTC alleges that Comcast caused its in-house call centers, as well as outside telemarketing contractors, to make telemarketing calls to sell Comcast’s cable television, Internet, and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) telephone services. Comcast does have written policies and procedures for compliance by its internal call centers and third-party telemarketers with the TSR, including the Rule’s entity-specific Do Not Call provisions. Despite these policies and procedures, the FTC contends that some of Comcast’s internal call centers and third-party telemarketing vendors together made more than 900,000 calls to consumers after those consumers specifically asked that the company stop calling them.

The Commission alleged that Comcast failed to implement a TSR-compliant Do Not Call program that would have identified problems at internal call centers and third-party telemarketing vendors and promptly corrected them. The FTC did not charge Comcast with calling consumers whose numbers are on the National Do Not Call Registry, but found its entity-specific Do Not Call violations serious and pervasive enough to warrant a complaint.

The proposed stipulated court order settling the Commission’s charges against Comcast would bar the company from violating the TSR in the future, including its entity-specific Do Not Call provisions, and imposes a civil penalty of $900,000. The proposed order also contains standard record-keeping and monitoring provisions to ensure Comcast’s compliance with its terms.

The FTC reminds businesses that compliance with the National Do Not Call Registry alone is not enough – they also need to make sure that they honor consumers’ company-specific Do Not Call requests.

The Commission vote approving each complaint and stipulated court order was 4-0. DOJ filed the complaints on the FTC’s behalf on April 15, 2009. DOJ will file the stipulated orders with DIRECTV, Inc., Voicecast Systems, Inc., also doing business as InTouch Solutions, and its principals Michael Kurtz and Keyvan Saedi in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division. The complaint and proposed order with Comcast Corporation have been submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

NOTE: The Commission authorizes the filing of complaints when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaints are not a finding or ruling that the defendants actually have violated the law.

NOTE: Stipulated court orders are for settlement purposes only and do not necessarily constitute an admission by the defendants of a law violation. Stipulated orders have the force of law when signed by the judge.

Copies of the complaints and proposed court orders are available from the FTC’s web site at http://www.ftc.gov and also from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,500 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

(FTC File Nos. 092-3098 – DirecTV and 062-3166 – Comcast; Civ. Nos. CV09-2605 and 2:09-cv-1589)

FTC Seeks Public Comment on Revised Proposed Rule Prohibiting Petroleum Market Manipulation

The Federal Trade Commission today issued a Revised Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (RNPRM) seeking public comment on a revised proposed rule that would prohibit market manipulation in the petroleum industry. The revised proposed rule would prohibit anyone from engaging in fraud or deceit in wholesale petroleum markets, or misleading any person by omitting important information from statements that might distort petroleum markets because of the omission. Once public comments have been received and reviewed, the FTC will move quickly to conclude the rulemaking proceeding.

Last spring the Commission published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to solicit public comments on the appropriate way to interpret and enforce the new authority Congress provided in the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) to prevent market manipulation in the petroleum industry. After reviewing comments, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on August 19, 2008, which set forth a proposed petroleum market manipulation rule and invited written comments on issues it raised. In response to the NPRM, the FTC received 34 comments from interested parties, including consumers, a consumer advocacy group, academics, a federal agency, state government agencies, a member of Congress, industry members, and trade and bar associations. On November 6, 2008, Commission staff held a one-day public workshop on the proposed rule. Commenters and workshop participants provided valuable feedback on several key issues relating to the proposed rule. Based on the record developed in this proceeding to date, the Commission has crafted the revised proposed rule for public comment.

The Revised Proposed Rule. The revised proposed rule in the RNPRM announced today retains the anti-fraud approach of the August 2008 proposed rule. The revised proposed rule would prohibit fraudulent and deceptive conduct that could harm wholesale petroleum markets. Specific examples of prohibited conduct include false public announcements of planned pricing or output decisions, false statistical or data reporting, and wash sales intended to disguise the actual liquidity or price of a particular product or market for that product. The revised proposed rule also would prohibit material omissions from a statement that, although otherwise literally true, are misleading under the circumstances.

Specifically, the revised proposed rule would prohibit anyone, directly or indirectly, in connection with the purchase or sale of crude oil, gasoline, or petroleum distillates at wholesale, from (a) knowingly engaging in any act, practice, or course of business – including the making of any untrue statement of material fact – that operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person, or (b) intentionally failing to state a material fact that under the circumstances renders a statement made by such person misleading, provided that such omission distorts or tends to distort market conditions for any such product.

The revised proposed rule would not impose any affirmative duties, obligations, or record-keeping requirements. Anyone violating an FTC rule promulgated under EISA, such as the revised proposed rule, if adopted, may face civil penalties of up to $1 million per violation per day, in addition to any relief available to the Commission under the FTC Act.

Opportunity for Public Comment. The Commission is seeking public comments on the revised proposed rule, as well as answers to the specific questions in the RNPRM. Comments must be received no later than May 20, 2009. Because the public already has had the opportunity to comment on many of the concepts presented in the revised proposed rule – through both written comments and workshop presentations and participation – the Commission believes that a 30-day comment period is appropriate.

The Commission vote to issue the RNPRM was 4-0. It will be available on the FTC’s Web site and likely will be published in the Federal Register on or about April 21, 2009.

Copies of the Revised Notice of Proposed Rulemaking are available from the FTC’s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.

(FTC File No. P082900)
(RNPRM.09.final.wpd)

FTC Publishes Proposed Breach Notification Rule for Electronic Health Information

The Federal Trade Commission today announced that it has approved a Federal Register notice seeking public comment on a proposed rule that would require entities to notify consumers when the security of their electronic health information is breached.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act) includes provisions to advance the use of health information technology and, at the same time, strengthen privacy and security protections for health information. Among other things, the Recovery Act recognizes that there are new types of Web-based entities that collect or handle consumers’ sensitive health information. Some of these entities offer personal health records, which consumers can use as an electronic, individually controlled repository for their medical information. Others provide online applications through which consumers can track and manage different kinds of information in their personal health records. For example, consumers can connect a device such as a pedometer to their computers and upload miles traveled, heart rate, and other data into their personal health records. These innovations have the potential to provide numerous benefits for consumers, which can only be realized if they have confidence that the security and confidentiality of their health information will be maintained.

To address these issues, the Recovery Act requires the Department of Health and Human Services to conduct a study and report, in consultation with the FTC, on potential privacy, security, and breach notification requirements for vendors of personal health records and related entities. This study and report must be completed by February 2010. In the interim, the Act requires the Commission to issue a temporary rule requiring these entities to notify consumers if the security of their health information is breached. The proposed rule the Commission is announcing today is the first step in implementing this requirement.

In keeping with the Recovery Act, the proposed rule requires vendors of personal health records and related entities to provide notice to consumers following a breach. The proposed rule also stipulates that if a service provider to one of these entities experiences a breach, it must notify the entity, which in turn must notify consumers of the breach. The proposed rule contains additional requirements governing the standard for what triggers the notice, as well as the timing, method, and content of notice. It also requires entities covered by the proposed rule to notify the FTC of any breaches. The FTC can then post information about the breaches on its Web site, and notify the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

The Commission vote approving issuance of the Federal Register notice was 4-0. The notice will be published in the Federal Register shortly, and is available now on the FTC’s Web site as a link to this press release. Public comments are being accepted through June 1, 2009, after which the Commission will issue a final interim rule. To file a public comment, please click on the following link: https://secure.commentworks.com/ftc-healthbreachnotification and follow the instructions at that site.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,500 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

(FTC File No. R91-1002)
(health info.wpd)

FTC Offers Pay-off Information to Consumers with Non-bank Credit Cards

For Your Information

Carrying a credit card balance can be expensive for consumers, especially for those who make only minimum monthly payments. The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 requires that consumers be provided with toll-free telephone numbers to call for an estimate of how long it will take to pay off their credit card balance, if they make minimum payments. To obtain appropriate information, consumers should call the telephone number for pay-off information that will be on their credit card billing statement. Large banks and the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) will be providing consumers with telephone numbers to call for pay-off information for bank-issued cards. Banks issue nearly all credit cards, including co-branded cards that have the name of an airline or a retailer.

The FTC is providing a telephone number (1-888-600-4804) for consumers with non-bank cards to call for their estimated pay-off information. Information is available in both English and Spanish. For consumers who prefer to use the Internet, the Commission also has posted on its Web site a calculator that provides the same information. To access the FTC’s on-line calculator, consumers should click on http://www.ftc.gov/creditcardcalculator. For Spanish-language consumers, information is available at http://www.ftc.gov/calculadora. The FRB, which is responsible for implementing the Bankruptcy Act, developed the telephone program and calculator.

Contact Information

MEDIA CONTACT:
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2180

SEC Issues GLB Model Privacy Form Test Data

For Your Information

The Federal Trade Commission announced today a Federal Register notice describing quantitative consumer testing of a model privacy form developed as part of a Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB) interagency notice project. The Securities and Exchange Commission has released for public comment the quantitative test information. Financial institutions may use the GLB model privacy form, which was proposed in 2007, to provide GLB-required disclosures to consumers about the institutions’ information collection and sharing practices. Interested parties have thirty days to file comments on the test information. The Federal Register notice is available at http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2009/34-59769.pdf. The quantitative test information is available at www.ftc.gov/privacy/privacyinitiatives/financial_rule_inrp.html.

(FYI 18.2009.wpd)

Contact Information

MEDIA CONTACT:
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2180