FTC Staff Supports Regulatory Changes that Promote Additional Competition in Passenger Vehicle Transportation Services in Anchorage, Alaska

Federal Trade Commission staff submitted written comments regarding certain proposed changes to Anchorage, Alaska’s regulatory framework for passenger vehicle transportation services, such as taxicab, sedan, and limousine services, in response to a request by Anchorage Assembly Member Debbie Ossiander.

A proposed ordinance would allow additional entrants into taxicab services through 2022, after which there would be no limits on how many taxicabs could operate in Anchorage.  FTC staff strongly supports eliminating restrictions on the number of vehicles that may provide taxicab service by 2022, or sooner, if practical, because additional entrants will generate consumer benefits and encourage competition.

The staff comments also recommend that, in markets with open entry, rates regarding passenger vehicle transportation services should generally be set by competitive forces and disclosed in a truthful and non-deceptive manner.

In addition, the comments suggest that the Assembly may want to consider additional steps to modernize its regulatory framework to respond to the development of smartphone software applications that provide consumers with new means of arranging for passenger vehicle transportation services and other new services.

The Commission vote approving the comments was 4-0.  (FTC File No. V130003; the staff contact is Christopher Grengs, Office of Policy Planning, 202-326-2612).

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.  Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

International Competition Network Advances Convergence Through Initiatives on Enforcement Cooperation and Investigative Process

The International Competition Network (ICN) advanced convergence through important initiatives on international enforcement cooperation and investigative processes in competition cases, the Federal Trade Commission announced today.  The ICN adopted new work product on economic analysis in merger review, legal theories in exclusive dealing investigations, international cooperation and information sharing in cartel enforcement, and the benefits of competition.

The 12th annual ICN conference, hosted by Poland’s Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (OCCP), was held on April 24-26, 2013, in Warsaw, Poland.  More than 500 delegates participated, representing more than 80 antitrust agencies from around the world, including competition experts from international organizations and the legal, business, consumer, and academic communities.  Federal Trade Commission Chairwoman Edith Ramirez and Assistant Attorney General Bill Baer of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division led the U.S. delegation.  The conference showcased the achievements of ICN working groups on cartels, competition advocacy, competition agency effectiveness, mergers, and unilateral conduct.

“This 12th annual ICN conference demonstrated how competition agencies from around the world can come together both to advance convergence toward best practices in antitrust enforcement and to strengthen the voice of competition policy as our governments confront common economic challenges,” said Chairwoman Ramirez.

Bronislaw Komorowski, the President of Poland, provided opening remarks at the conference.  John Fingleton, former Chief Executive of the UK Office of Fair Trading and former ICN Steering Group Chair, moderated a panel on competition and its relevance to global economic policy discussion among representatives from the World Trade Organization, World Bank and International Chamber of Commerce.  Joaquin Almunia, European Commission Vice President and Commissioner for Competition, also addressed the conference.  Eduardo Pérez Motta, ICN Steering Group Chair and President of the Mexican Federal Competition Commission, spoke about his initiatives to support ICN member competition advocacy and enhance cooperation with international organizations.
           
The Polish OCCP led a special project devoted to the interaction between competition agencies and courts, culminating in a session led by OCCP President Malgorzata Krasnodebska-Tomkiel.  FTC Chairwoman Ramirez addressed the vital role of economic evidence in competition cases and offered guidance for how to effectively present this evidence to generalist courts.  She also highlighted the various tools available to competition agencies to encourage courts to recognize competition law principles.
           
The Agency Effectiveness Working Group, co-chaired by the FTC, the Mexican Federal Competition Commission, and the Norwegian Competition Authority, examines the institutions and procedures that support the enforcement missions of competition agencies.  Randolph W. Tritell, Director of the FTC’s Office of International Affairs, led a panel discussion and presentation of the group’s work related to investigative tools and agency transparency practices, part of a project on investigative processes in competition cases.

“The ICN’s new investigative process project has produced impressive data and a report highlighting substantial agreement on agencies’ practices designed to ensure adequate transparency in antitrust investigations,” Director Tritell said.  The working group also presented two new chapters on effective knowledge management and human resources management for its competition agency practice manual.

The conference showcased the ICN Curriculum Project, a project led by the FTC to create a “virtual university” of training materials on competition law and practice.  FTC Counsel Paul O’Brien presented the Curriculum Project and its new modules on planning and conducting investigations, competition advocacy, and challenges for agencies in developing countries.

Assistant Attorney General Baer moderated a panel of antitrust officials on international enforcement cooperation to discuss the strengths and limitations of current cooperation frameworks.  The panel also discussed future ICN work that could best help antitrust agencies address the challenges of engaging effectively in international enforcement cooperation.  Over the past year, the ICN partnered with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)’s Competition Committee on a comprehensive study of the state of international enforcement cooperation.  Lynda K. Marshall, Assistant Chief of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division’s Foreign Commerce Section, led a discussion on future work on international cooperation in cartel enforcement.

“One of the defining characteristics of the ICN is the deep engagement of its members on critical antitrust issues, including mergers, anti-cartel enforcement, unilateral conduct and competition advocacy,” said Assistant Attorney General Baer. “The discussions and work product emerging from this meeting strengthen the ties between U.S. enforcers and our counterparts around the globe and enhance effective antitrust enforcement for the benefit of all consumers.”

The Merger Working Group, co-chaired by the European Commission’s Competition Directorate, the Competition Commission of India, and the Italian Competition Authority aims to promote best practices in the design and operation of merger review regimes. The FTC’s Director of the Bureau of Economics, Howard Shelanski, participated in a panel discussion of the role of economic analysis in merger review.  The panel highlighted the group’s new work addressing the role of economic evidence in merger analysis, a comprehensive overview of the qualitative and quantitative analyses available to antitrust agencies for the review of horizontal mergers.  

The Unilateral Conduct Working Group, co-chaired by the Swedish Competition Authority, the Turkish Competition Authority, and the UK Office of Fair Trading, promotes convergence and sound enforcement of laws governing conduct by firms with substantial market power.  The working group presented a new workbook chapter on exclusive dealing arrangements as part of a project that is producing a practical guide to the investigation of the various types of unilateral conduct.

The conference also highlighted the work of the Cartel Working Group, co-chaired by the Department of Justice, the Japan Fair Trade Commission and Germany’s Bundeskartellamt.  The working group brings together antitrust enforcers to address the challenges of anti-cartel enforcement, through the examination of important policy issues and the exchange of effective investigative techniques.  The group presented a new chapter on international cooperation and information sharing for its Anti-Cartel Enforcement Manual, a reference tool for antitrust agencies on effective investigative techniques. 

The Advocacy Working Group, co-chaired by the French Autorité de la Concurrence, the Portuguese Competition Authority, and the Competition Commission of Mauritius, develops practical tools and guidance to improve the effectiveness of ICN members’ competition advocacy.  This year, the working group developed draft guidance on procedures and analysis for assessing existing or proposed laws and regulations to determine whether they may have a significant impact on competition.  The group also presented its work on practical techniques to help promote a competition culture and strategies for explaining the benefits of competition to other government entities.

The ICN was created in October 2001, when the FTC and the Department of Justice joined antitrust agencies from 13 other jurisdictions to increase understanding of competition policy and promote convergence toward best practices around the world.  The ICN now includes 126 member agencies from 111 jurisdictions.

ICN documents are available at www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org.

MEDIA CONTACT:

FTC Issues Updated FAQs on Amended Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule

The Federal Trade Commission has issued an updated set of frequently asked questions designed to help website operators, mobile application developers, plug-ins and advertising networks operating on child-directed websites and online services prepare for upcoming changes to the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule.

The document, titled “Complying With COPPA: Frequently Asked Questions” contains information directed to websites and online services whose work online may involve the collection of personal information from children under age 13. The document provides guidance from the FTC staff that supplements the rule and other COPPA–related material previously published by the FTC.

In addition to the guidelines and frequently asked questions, FTC staff maintain a “COPPA Hotline” email address, [email protected], where industry members can send questions on how to ensure they are compliant with the rule. FTC staff will periodically update the FAQs. Comments on the FAQs or suggestions for new FAQs may be submitted through the COPPA Hotline email address.

The Commission finalized amendments to the COPPA Rule last December, and they will go into effect on July 1 of this year. The process to review the rule was begun in 2010 with the intent to modernize the rule and ensure that children’s privacy protections kept up with evolving technology and changes in the way children use and access the Internet, including the increased use of mobile devices and social networking.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.  Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

FTC Approves Final Order Settling Competition Charges Against Robert Bosch GmbH; FTC Staff Files Comment With Illinois Legislature Regarding Pain Management Services

FTC Approves Final Order Settling Competition Charges Against Robert Bosch GmbH

Following a public comment period, the Federal Trade Commission has approved a final order settling charges that Robert Bosch GmbH’s acquisition of the SPX Service Solutions business of SPX Corporation would have given it a virtual monopoly in the market for air conditioning recycling, recovery, and recharge devices for vehicles.

Today’s action by the FTC finalizes a proposed order that was first announced by the agency in November 2012.  It also resolves allegations that, before its acquisition by Bosch, SPX harmed competition in the market for this equipment by reneging on a commitment to license key, standard-essential patents (SEPs) on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms.

Under the settlement with the FTC, Bosch has agreed to sell its automotive air conditioner repair equipment business, including RTI Technologies, Inc., to automotive equipment manufacturer, Mahle Clevite, Inc.  Bosch also has agreed to abandon its claims for injunctive relief related to the key standard-essential patents.

The Commission vote approving the final order and letters to members of the public who commented on it was 2-1-1, with Commissioner Maureen K. Ohlhausen voting no and Commissioner Joshua D. Wright not participating.  (FTC File No. 121-0081; the staff contact is Jacqueline K. Mendel, Bureau of Competition, 202-326-2334; see press release dated November 26, 2012.)
 
FTC Staff Files Comment With Illinois Legislature Regarding Pain Management Services

Federal Trade Commission staff has responded to a request from Illinois State Senator Heather Steans for comments on a proposed state law that would allow only physicians to provide chronic interventional pain treatments, and bar certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) from providing pain management services that they currently provide, such as epidural injections.

According to the FTC staff comment, the proposed law “threatens to raise costs, limit access, and reduce choices for Illinois patients.  We therefore recommend that the Illinois Senate carefully investigate patient safety issues and ensure that any statutory limits on CRNAs are no stricter than patient safety requires.” The staff comment notes the Institute of Medicine has identified a key role for advanced practice nurses – including CRNAs – in improving health care delivery and access, and notes that many Illinois counties face shortages of anesthesiologists and board-certified physician pain specialists.

The Commission vote approving the comment was 4-0. (FTC File No. V130007; the staff contact is Daniel J. Gilman, Office of Policy Planning, 202-326-3136.)

Copies of the document mentioned in this release are available from the FTC’s website at http://www.ftc.gov and from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580.  Call toll-free:  1-877-FTC-HELP.  Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

FTC Wins Court Judgment Against Remaining NHS Systems Defendants

At the Federal Trade Commission’s request, a U.S. district court entered a judgment against five individuals and the telemarketing operation they ran for violating the FTC Act and the agency’s Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR).  The court order permanently bars the defendants, who operated under a variety of names, including NHS Systems, Inc., from telemarketing, charging consumers’ bank accounts, and making false and misleading statements.  It also requires them to pay almost $6.9 million, the amount their scheme took from defrauded consumers.

In entering the judgment, Judge Juan R. Sánchez wrote that, “All defendants have acted with reckless disregard for the financial interest and security of thousands of consumers.  They have demonstrated their continued ability, desire, and success in committing the same deceptive acts. The danger of recurrent violations is real.”

The FTC’s complaint originally was filed as part of ‘Operation Tele-Phoney’, a 2008 crackdown on deceptive telemarketing.  According to an amended complaint filed in 2009, the defendants used third-party telemarketers to unfairly and deceptively market and charge consumers for one or more discount health programs. 

During sales calls, the telemarketers led consumers to believe they were from, or affiliated with, U.S. government agencies, including the Social Security Administration, the Internal Revenue Service, and Medicare.  They promised consumers that they would receive substantial deposits into their bank accounts – in the form of grants, tax refunds, or tax rebates – if they first provided their account or credit card information.  In many instances, the callers told consumers that they had been unconditionally selected.

In many cases, the defendants’ telemarketers also allegedly used deceptive tactics to obtain a “verification” of consumers’ authorization to charge their accounts, and often created false verification recordings.  In some cases, the telemarketers told Medicare beneficiaries that they had to provide their financial information to continue receiving their benefits.  In other cases, the defendants charged consumers’ financial accounts without any notice and without their authorization.

Consumers often were charged $29.95 to receive health care information, $299.95 to enroll in the program, and $19.95 per month thereafter, finding themselves in a “discount health care program” they never agreed to purchase.  

In granting summary judgment against the NHS defendants, the court found that their conduct was unfair, as it “caused and was likely to cause substantial financial injury to the consumers.”  The court also found that that their conduct was deceptive and that the defendants’ telemarketers made the alleged misrepresentations to consumers, in violation of the FTC Act.

Finally, the court found that the NHS defendants violated several provisions of the TSR by:  1) misrepresenting the total cost of the programs; 2) overcharging consumers; 3) charging consumers who were not enrolled in the healthcare program; 4) charging consumers to enroll in what was supposed to be a free program; 5) misrepresenting aspects of goods and services sold; and 6) using audio authorizations that did not comply with the Rule.

The judgment announced today resolves the FTC’s charges against the following individual defendants:  1) Nicole Bertrand; 2) Barry Kirstein; 3) David James Greer, also known as “Dannie Boie”; 4) Linke Jn Paul; and 5) Tasha Jn Paul, as well as the following corporate defendants:  1) NHS Systems, Inc., also doing business as (d/b/a) National Healthcare Solutions and National Health Net Online; 2) Plus Health Savings, Inc.; 3) Physicians Health Systems, Inc.; 4) Physician Health Service, LLC, also d/b/a American Health Benefits On Line; 5) Health Management, LLC; 6) 6676529 Canada, Inc.; 7) PHS Enterprises, Inc.; 8) First Step Management, Inc.; 9) Gold Dot, Inc.; and 10) Nevada Business Solutions, Inc. 

The following defendants previously settled the FTC’s charges: 1) Harry F. Bell, Jr.; 2) John E. Bartholomew, Interface Management, Inc., and Beginning Again, Inc.; and 3) Donna Newman.

The FTC would like to acknowledge the Competition Bureau of Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and the Centre of Operations Linked to Telemarketing Fraud (Project COLT) for their valuable assistance in bringing this action against NHS Systems, Inc. and the other defendants.  Launched in 1998, Project COLT combats telemarketing-related crime, and includes members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Sureté du Québec, Service de Police de la Ville de Montréal, Canada Border Services Agency, Competition Bureau of Canada, Canada Post, U.S. Homeland Security (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the U.S. Secret Service), the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  Since its inception, Project COLT has recovered over $22 million for victims of telemarketing fraud.

The FTC also would like to thank the Office of the Inspector General, Social Security Administration, as well as the U.S. Postal Inspection Service for their valuable assistance.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them.  To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357).  The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.  The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.  Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

FTC Survey for 2011 Shows an Estimated 25.6 Million Americans Fell Victim to Fraud

The Federal Trade Commission today released a statistical survey of fraud in the United States during 2011, which showed that an estimated 25.6 million adults – 10.8 percent of the adult population – were fraud victims.

cover of fraud survey report“The FTC fights fraud every day by taking scammers to court and telling consumers how to avoid being scammed.  Studies like this one help us fine-tune both our enforcement and education efforts,” said Charles Harwood, Acting Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.

While fast-growing online commerce has benefitted consumers with greater choice and convenience, the survey indicates that, as of 2011, the Internet was also the place where consumers most often learned about fraudulent offers.  The Internet category, which included email, social media, auction sites and classified ads, was followed by print advertising, and TV and radio.  Most consumers bought fraudulent items via the Internet; telephone purchases ranked second.

The survey asked consumers about 15 specific categories of fraud, and two general categories, and of the specific categories the top 10 were:

  • Weight-loss Products (5.1 million estimated)
  • Prize Promotions (2.4 million est.)
  • Unauthorized Billing for Buyers’ Club Memberships (1.9 million est.)
  • Unauthorized Billing for Internet Services (1.9 million est.)
  • Work-at-Home Programs (1.8 million est.)
  • Credit Repair Scams (1.7 million est.)
  • Debt Relief (1.5 million est.)
  • Credit Card Insurance (1.3 million est.)
  • Business Opportunities (1.1 million est.)
  • Mortgage Relief Scams (800,000 est.)

An estimated 17.3 percent of African Americans and 13.4 percent of Hispanics were victims; the rate for non- Hispanic whites was 9 percent.  The survey found that high school graduates were the least likely to have been fraud victims; those who did not complete high school were the most likely to have been victims.  Consumers who were more willing to take risks and those who had recently experienced a negative life event (such as a divorce, death of a family member or close friend, serious injury or illness in their family, or the loss of a job) were much more likely to have been victims.  Consumers who indicated they had more debt than they could handle were significantly more likely to have been fraud victims than those who were more comfortable with the amount of debt they had.

The FTC offers more information for consumers in 10 Ways to Avoid Fraud, Avoiding Online Scams and Common Online Scams.

The Commission vote to release the survey was 4-0.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.  Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

FTC Alerts Consumers Who Want to Help Boston Bombing Victims

The Federal Trade Commission, the nation’s consumer protection agency, has tips for people who may want to donate money to the victims and families of the Boston bombings.

Before making a contribution, you should read the FTC’s Helping Victims of the Bombing in Boston — Make Sure Your Donations Count, also available in Spanish,  Cómo ayudar a las víctimas del ataque perpetrado en Boston – Asegúrese de que sus donaciones contribuyan con la causa que usted desea apoyar.

In general, urgent appeals for aid that you get in person, by phone, mail, e-mail, or on websites and social networking sites may not be on the up-and-up.  The FTC’s Charity Checklist has tips for guidance on donating wisely.

If you are asked to contribute to a charity, the FTC recommends that you:

  • Ask for the name of the charity if the telemarketer does not provide it promptly;
  • Ask what percentage of your donation will support the cause described in the solicitation;
  • Verify that the charity has authorized the solicitation;
  • Do not provide any credit card or bank information until you have reviewed all information from the charity and made the decision to donate;
  • Ask for a receipt showing the amount of the contribution and stating that it is tax deductible; and
  • Avoid cash gifts. For security and tax record purposes, it’s best to pay by check – made payable to the beneficiary, not the solicitor.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.  Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

FTC Staff Comment Supports Proposed Social Security Administration Policy Change to Help Protect Children From Identity Theft

In a comment submitted to the Social Security Administration, the staff of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Consumer Protection expressed support for an SSA proposal designed to protect children from identity theft. Staff also recommended two refinements to the SSA proposal to provide further safeguards.

Under the proposal, the SSA would adopt a new policy to allow the Social Security number of a child under 13 to be changed in the event the child’s Social Security card was stolen in transit, the child’s Social Security number was incorrectly disclosed through SSA’s Death Master File, or a third party had misused the child’s number. Current policy allows such a change only with evidence of recent harm to the individual, which can be difficult to show for a child.

The FTC staff comment recommends that children age 17 and under be included within the new policy. Staff notes that many children who are victims of identity theft before age 13 may not know they have been victimized until they are older and applying for credit or an apartment. In addition, FTC staff recommends that language in the new policy allow reporting by parents, guardians, law enforcement and child welfare agencies as methods by which the SSA can receive notification that a child’s Social Security number has been stolen.

The commission vote approving the issuance of the comment was 4-0. The comment was sent to the SSA on April 12, 2013. (FTC File No. P065411; the staff contact is Megan Cox, 202-326-2282)

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.  Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

Graco, Inc. Settles FTC Charges That Its Acquisitions Illegally Harmed Competition in the U.S. Market for Fast Set Equipment

Graco, Inc. has settled Federal Trade Commission charges that it violated the antitrust laws by buying Gusmer Corp. (Gusmer) in 2005 and GlasCraft, Inc. (GCI) in 2008, its two closest competitors in the North American market for fast set equipment (FSE) used by contractors to apply polyurethane foams and polyurea coatings. 

The consent order settling the FTC’s charges is designed to restore competition to the FSE market that was lost as a result of Graco’s acquisitions.  It incorporates a private litigation settlement between Graco and Polyurethane Machinery Corp. (Gama/PMC) that requires Graco to license certain technology to Gama/PMC.  The consent order also contains provisions that provide Gama/PMC and other competitors easier access to distributors, so they can distribute competing FSE products effectively in the North American market.

“Although Graco was not required to report the Gusmer and GCI transactions under the HSR reporting requirements, those acquisitions eliminated virtually all of its competition in the fast set equipment market,” said Richard Feinstein, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition.  “The clear result was higher prices and diminished choices for consumers.”         

Graco is a publicly traded company headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota.  The company, which entered the FSE market in 2002, sells FSE almost exclusively to third-party distributors that act as middlemen between Graco and the product’s end users.  Approximately 550 distributors currently sell Graco FSE in the United States.  Before Graco’s acquisitions of Gusmer and GCI, FSE distributors typically carried products from multiple manufacturers.           

The FTC’s complaint alleges that the acquisitions eliminated head-to-head competition among Graco, Gusmer, and GCI, leaving the market almost entirely in Graco’s hands.  After the acquisitions, Graco raised prices for its FSE products, reduced product options, reduced innovation, and raised barriers to entry for firms seeking to compete with Graco, by taking steps to ensure that its distributors would distribute only Graco’s products. 

In addition to the requirement that Graco execute the settlement it negotiated with Gama/PMC, the consent order also requires Graco to stop implementing any arrangement with distributors that will preclude them from dealing with Graco’s FSE competitors.  The order also prohibits Graco from discriminating, coercing, threatening, or in any other way pressuring its distributors not to carry its competitors’ FSE products.

The consent order further requires Graco to waive or modify any policies or contracts that might violate the terms of the order, to notify the FTC for 10 years if its intends to acquire any interest in a company that manufactures or sells FSE, and to notify the FTC before suing any distributor or customer regarding a claimed violation of its FSE-related intellectual property rights.

The Commission vote to accept the consent agreement and issue the order as final was 4-0, with Chairwoman Edith Ramirez, Commissioner Julie Brill, and Commissioner Maureen K. Ohlhausen issuing a separate Commission statement.  The vote to issue the Commission statement was 3-0-1, with Commissioner Joshua D. Wright abstaining. Commissioner Wright issued a separate statement.

FTC rules allow an order to take effect immediately prior to the public comment period in appropriate cases.  The Commission believes this is an appropriate situation because the effectiveness of the remedy depends on the timeliness of the private settlement between Graco and Gama/PMC, which only becomes effective after the consent order is final.  The agreement, though final, will be subject to public comment for 30 days, beginning today and continuing through May 20, 2013, and the FTC will publish a description of the consent agreement package in the Federal Register shortly. 

Interested parties can submit comments electronically or in paper form by following the instructions in the “Invitation To Comment” part of the “Supplementary Information” section. Comments in paper form should be mailed or delivered to:  Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H-113, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580.  The FTC is requesting that any comment filed in paper form near the end of the public comment period be sent by courier or overnight service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the Washington area and at the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security precautions. Comments also can be submitted electronically

NOTE:  The Commission issues an administrative complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest.  The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the respondent has actually violated the law.  A consent order is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by the respondent that the law has been violated.  When the Commission issues a consent order on a final basis, it carries the force of law with respect to future actions.  Each violation of such an order may result in a civil penalty of up to $16,000.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.  Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

FTC Amends Alternative Fuels Rule to Make Compliance Easier

The Federal Trade Commission has issued final amendments to the Alternative Fuels Rule, consolidating the labels required on alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs) with those required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), eliminating the need for two different labels and reducing the burden of complying with the Rule. This action is part of the FTC’s systematic review of all current FTC rules and guides.

Created in 1995 under the Energy Policy Act of 1992, the Rule requires labels that provide information, such as driving range and fuel type, to help consumers comparison shop. In June 2011, the FTC began its review of the Rule. In June 2012, the agency proposed changes to the Rule and sought public comment. After weighing the comments it received, the FTC approved the changes announced today, to consolidate FTC labels with EPA fuel economy labels for all AFVs and eliminate FTC labeling requirements for used AFVs.

Since 1992, the FTC has reviewed all its rules and guides on a rotating basis to ensure they are up-to-date, effective, and not overly burdensome. The agency relies on input from the public, including consumers, businesses, advocates, industry experts and others, to help it decide whether rules and guides should be updated, left as is, or rescinded.

The Commission vote approving the Federal Register notice announcing the final amendments was 4-0. The notice can be found on the FTC’s website and as a link to this press release. The final Rule will become effective May 31, 2013. (FTC File Number R311002; the staff contact is Hampton Newsome, Bureau of Consumer Protection, 202-326-2889)

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics. Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.